JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

Same book, different cover

June 30, 2010

Opinion

The swearing-in of a woman as Prime Minister of Australia is a milestone for women in this country, however, a number of woman leaders in our region have contacted me in recent days expressing a degree of puzzlement over the "novelty factor" in response to the change of leader.

I have met a number of these women leaders, most recently at a Women Leaders in Asia Summit where it was generally agreed that it is the policies, principles and competence of a person coupled with a strong set of values and ethics that matter when it comes to national leadership.

It is true that our nation already has a female head of State (the Queen), a female Governor General, female state premiers and women in leadership roles throughout the public and private sectors.

It is also true that women have been popularly elected as leaders by voters in New Zealand, Pakistan, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, among others.

Australia's first female Prime Minister has come to office in the same way that New South Wales also achieved the milestone of first female Premier – through the decision of the parliamentary party factions to remove the male incumbent.

This does not lessen the legitimacy of either position as our political system accommodates such decisions and parliamentary leaders are not directly elected to office.

The next milestone will be for a woman to be elected by the Australian public as the leader of the party that wins office at a federal election.

Nevertheless it is a significant achievement.

The immediate challenge for the Labor Party is to explain why the factional warlords carried out a political assassination of Kevin Rudd and installed Julia Gillard, given that she was at the heart of the same decisions and the implementation of the same policies that led to Labor's dip in the opinion polls.

The hallmark of the Rudd/Gillard Government was wasteful spending, incompetent management and bad policy making and Gillard was co-author of it all.

The public is well aware that Gillard had personal oversight of the infamous school halls program.

She must bear the infamy of being the minister responsible for the most reckless spending in any Federal Government program in political history, given that billions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted.

The only way to get to the truth of how this program was so comprehensively mismanaged and who benefited most from it, is to hold an independent inquiry with judicial powers of investigation.

It is simply not good enough for Gillard to say that she had to act quickly because of the global financial crisis and therefore any level of waste of taxpayers money is acceptable.

Her only response to the reports of widespread rorting and buildings costing three or four times more than they should have, has been to set up a so-called taskforce, which will not report until after the election.

The head of that taskforce has recently admitted to not having read a report into the program by the Australian National Audit Office and to not having made any effort to determine value for money from the program.

Prime Minister Gillard used the same GFC alibi when defending the home insulation program under questioning in Parliament: "These were difficult circumstances: the biggest global economic downturn since the Great Depression. We faced a prospect where hundreds of thousands of additional Australians could have been out of work."

While acknowledging that the program was a "mess" Gillard ignored the fact that one of the contributing factors in the tragic deaths of four young installers was the failure to quickly implement an adequate training program, despite numerous warnings from the sector.

Gillard was the senior portfolio Minister responsible for the implementation of that training program.

Another issue of great concern to the Australian people is the influx of people arriving on dangerous leaky boats in our northern waters and seeking asylum.

Under questioning from Laurie Oakes last Sunday, Gillard admitted that she was the principal author of Labor's policy to weaken the nation's border protection laws.

That means she must accept the vast bulk of the responsibility for the resumption of the people smuggling trade that have enabled 141 boats carrying over 6650 people to reach our shores.

Tragically there have been reports of several boats embarking on the dangerous journey but not arriving and grave fears are held for several hundred people.

To date, Ms Gillard has simply parroted Mr Rudd's contradictory rhetoric of being tough but humane.

As we learn more of Ms Gillard's role in crafting the weakened border protection laws, the decision to abandon a climate change policy, the school halls debacle, the home insulation scandal and the mining tax disaster, the public are entitled to ask: is this the same book, just a different cover?

44 comments so far

  • I could hear the plates smashing in your kitchen from my house on Thursday night.

    Phrases such as "how dare that red-headed..." and "it was supposed to be me..." wafted across the nation amongst the other expletives, hissing, and breaking crockery.

    Commenter
    Riddley
    Date and time
    June 30, 2010, 8:01AM
  • Just a point. I understand that the "Head of State" is, to all intents and purposes, the Governor General. HM is the Sovereign, and long may She remain so.

    Commenter
    JohnB
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    June 30, 2010, 8:21AM
  • I smell the stink of sour grapes. Shame you won't get the chance to show you could do better - NOT!

    Commenter
    MS
    Date and time
    June 30, 2010, 8:21AM
  • Put your claws away Bishop. You would never be a woman who made the first PM. Not in a million years.

    Commenter
    cb
    Date and time
    June 30, 2010, 8:19AM
  • Riddley: There was no chance it was ever going to be her!

    But you need to get your sexism in check. Why was she in the kitchen, throwing plates and hissing about redheads? I suspect Rudd and Abbott were doing a pretty good amount of crockery smashing in their kitchens as well as weeping manly tears of frustration at so many opportunities lost?

    Commenter
    M T Pockets
    Date and time
    June 30, 2010, 8:23AM
  • John B - I might be wrong, but I believe the queen is the head of state here, as she is in Britain and in all the other former British constitutional monarchies. The GG is only the acting head of state because the queen is normally out of the country. As she is the queen of Australia, she is the legal head of state.
    I wouldn't worry too much about sour grapes from Julie. After the number of opposition leaders she's seen off and her own proven incompetence at everything she's attempted in politics, even she wouldn't aspire to be any sort of PM - although, come to think of it, people thought the same of Tony Abbott! Surely not?

    Commenter
    BillR
    Date and time
    June 30, 2010, 8:40AM
  • Riddley - June 30, 2010, 8:01AM
    MS - June 30, 2010, 8:21AM
    cb - June 30, 2010, 8:19AM

    Can't defeat the logic...let's attack the author? Great plan.

    Can any of the questions posed be answered by Gillard before the next election? She has already refused to answer what her involvement was by declaring that what got said in the kitchen cabinet remains confidential.

    My question? Why, if Rudd was so off course, did someone not put him back on course? With a full cabinet meeting giving it to him straight? No? Just let him do what he wants then knife him in the back and say it was all of his fault? Seriosly? I am expected to believe that? The other one plays Jingle Bells.

    Commenter
    Colin
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    June 30, 2010, 8:41AM
  • Gillard v Bishop...?

    No contest.

    Commenter
    mick
    Location
    brighton
    Date and time
    June 30, 2010, 9:22AM
  • I agree with the point made by Colin. Those who attack the author of this piece show their ignorance or their slavish devotion to the decisions of the ALP factional hacks.
    Gillard is just as guilty as Rudd for the incompetence and backflips we've seen from Labor over the life of this government.
    To use this "historic" milestone of our first female PM to distract from Gillard's contribution to the Labor mess and backflips, does no service to women in government nor to Australia.
    Ms Bishop has pointed this out, but we can be sure that the ALP and Emily's List will try to distract us from the reality.

    Commenter
    JohnB
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    June 30, 2010, 9:12AM
  • Christine Wallace on qanda the other night suggested the Government and Opposition take the boat-people issue off the table as a political football, approach the issue on a bipartisan basis and come up with a compassionate solution that might be respected by the rest of the world. Julie, you're not going to lead that charge are you?

    Commenter
    jofek
    Date and time
    June 30, 2010, 9:02AM

More comments

Make a comment

You are logged in as [Logout]

All information entered below may be published.

Error: Please enter your screen name.

Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Please enter your comment.

Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

Post to

You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

Thank you

Your comment has been submitted for approval.

Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.