JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

Wake-up call on education

June 28, 2010

Opinion

While there have been significant concerns raised in recent weeks over the fate of Australia’s mining and resource sector, in particular our two major export earners coal and iron ore, as a result of the Labor Government's proposed 40 per cent mining super tax, the fate of our third largest export earner – education services – is also under pressure.

It has been to Australia's credit that it has long hosted students from our region through a system of scholarships.

The Colombo Plan, which supported development in the Asia Pacific, is remembered for the opportunities it provided for thousands of students from the region to study or train in Australia during the operation of the plan from the early 1950s to the 1980s.

Initially championed by Menzies government foreign minister Percy Spender this initiative has had a profound impact on Australian foreign policy that is still felt today. It is not uncommon for regional political and business leaders to be Colombo Plan alumni from Australian universities.

Australia continued to expand its scholarship program, but it has also welcomed hundreds of thousands of students taking fee-paying places at our universities and vocational colleges.
During the years of the Howard government, the popularity of our educational institutions led to strong growth representing $16 billion in export income with about 500,000 overseas students studying at our institutions.

As minister for education, science and training in 2006 and 2007, I was keen to promote greater student exchange with a focus not only on students studying in Australia, but also increasing the number of Australian students undertaking studies overseas.

It was and remains my view that educational exchanges enhance long term mutual understanding between nations. One of the most powerful and productive ways to engage with our region is to have critical numbers of people with first-hand experiences of living and studying in other countries.

In April 2006 I hosted an International Education Forum in Brisbane, with 900 delegates from around the world, which focused on future directions and influences on international education and training in Australia.

A separate Asia-Pacific Education Minister’s Meeting was convened, attended by 27 ministers and senior officials representing the education and training portfolios from across the Asia-Pacific region. As host, I sought to strengthen opportunities for student exchange in the region encouraging greater social, economic and cultural development.

After years of rapid growth, I believed it was important that Australia ascertain what the students thought about the experience of studying in Australia.

The Department of Education through Australian Education International (AEI) commissioned a research paper aimed at assessing the overall satisfaction of international students studying in Australia published in September 2007.

Interviews had been conducted with more than 7000 international students in their final year of study in Australia in higher education, vocational education, secondary schools and English language courses.  The survey showed that:
• 84 per cent of international students were satisfied with living in Australia;
• 83 per cent were satisfied with the study experience in Australia;
• 82 per cent were happy with the course undertaken; and
• 78 per cent were satisfied with the quality of education.

While the results were positive, there was also room for improvement, particularly in terms of the quality of courses on offer and ensuring students received value for money.

With the spate of attacks on India students in recent months, the reputation of Australia as a safe destination for students has been damaged. While efforts are now being made to restore our reputation in India, the impact of the negative publicity continues to take its toll.

Universities are reporting a massive drop in overseas student enrolments, and as high as a 90 per cent decrease from previous years in relation to students from India.

I fear that Prime Minister and Education Minister Julia Gillard has failed to build on the groundwork laid by successive governments. Gillard has not reconvened the International Education Forum, despite significant interest from representatives at the original forum.

Nor has she reconvened the Asia-Pacific Education Minister’s meeting.

I am not aware of any new initiatives to encourage Australian students to undertake any part of their studies overseas.

There is no evidence that the Labor government has commissioned any follow-up research about the satisfaction levels of international students studying in Australia. Statistics gathered during the previous Coalition government years are the only information quoted on the AEI website. Former federal Liberal MP Bruce Baird was asked to undertake research into international students in Australia and his report published in February this year exposed a range of concerns held by international students.

Baird wrote to Gillard urging action on the issue, as there was ''an urgent need to develop, implement and enforce relevant and robust solutions to address issues including student safety, accommodation, employment, transport and health''.

While legislation has just been introduced into the Parliament to address some aspects of the report, it must not suffer the fate of so many of former Rudd government reports destined to gather dust on Canberra archive shelves.

The federal government announced major reforms for the skilled migration program earlier this year, to make it more difficult for international students to gain permanent residency.
The new changes are favouring employer-sponsored migration, yet making it harder for international students to migrate. All applicants for independent skilled migration under General Skilled Migration visa applications must now have qualifications relevant to an occupation on the Skilled Occupations List.

While the system needed reform, the overseas education sector is now in turmoil.
Other countries, including the United States and Canada are making fresh inroads into the international education sphere.

The long term sustainability of our international education will hinge on whether Australia offers international students a high quality education that is value for money with welcoming entry procedures and a safe and secure environment.

27 comments so far

  • You are right Julie,
    Ms Gillard has decided to close the immigration loophole that made our educaton facilities so attractive to overseas students- who by busting their guts through a torrid and taxing course on hair care could get permanent residency. How dare she!
    Think of all those high quality and durable institutions that failed as a result of this decision, all those universities that went to the wall, all those immigration agents that... OK ,maybe that was a bit too much...
    Of course you got such a good result from your survey in 2007.. after all what were they going to say.. "Nah, came over here and enrolled in a shifty course on elementary cooking.. actually had to get up before 10 in the morning and turn up at the school every week.. and for what? Just so I could get a permanent resident's papers... where's the value for money in that?"
    Now the government has tried to clean up that nice little earner and copped all the flack from doing so, it might be advisable for you to adopt a low profile and perhaps not remind us that you got us into that mess to begin with.. Up to you of course but seems like a wise move to me..

    Commenter
    David
    Location
    Leongatha
    Date and time
    June 28, 2010, 7:47AM
  • I must say that the two ladies who have been Minister for Education in recent times have both done pretty badly on some issues. They certainly know how to offend teachers. I hope teachers will help vote out the Gillard Government and that Tony Abbott does not appoint Julie Bishop to the Education portfolio.

    Commenter
    David Morrison
    Location
    Springwood NSW
    Date and time
    June 28, 2010, 8:03AM
  • I must say that the two ladies who have been Minister for Education in recent times have both done pretty badly on some issues. They certainly know how to offend teachers. I hope teachers will help vote out the Gillard Government and that Tony Abbott does not appoint Julie Bishop to the Education portfolio.

    Commenter
    David Morrison
    Location
    Springwood NSW
    Date and time
    June 28, 2010, 8:05AM
  • Our education system is meant to be an investment in our future - not another "product" to be exported. As Education Minister, Julie oversaw a decline in the number of Australian school leavers entering university and, when questioned about that decline said it was a good thing as it meant 18 year olds were choosing jobs in mining.

    The result for me as an employer in the high tech industry is that I often have to look off-shore for the knowledge needed to keep innovating in order to compete globally.

    Our priority in education is to ensure that our children receive the best education they get - and all children, not just those in the elite "private" schools that us taxpayers fund. We can then build a much greater export market using our minds as well as our mines.

    Commenter
    bikegeek
    Location
    terrigal
    Date and time
    June 28, 2010, 8:07AM
  • Education is too important for any political party but meddle and muddle they do. Your history lesson overlooked the sustained drop in per capita expenditure on university students by your government when in power. Again, in the interests of 'competition and efficiency' you encouraged a rapid expansion of the private vocational college sector. Recently, Baird found some were little more than residency visa factories. Rorting is not limited to home insulation. It is everywhere - even inside the federal parliament! Gillard, as Education Minister, did one thing that you Bishop failed to do. She tried to make a difference to the schooling experience of pupils outside the private and often very wealthy school system we have. The fact that she had to call it an 'education revolution' and that phrase resonated with so many folk at election time speaks volumes for why you should not and never write again about education policy or principle. You had neither.

    The damage to our reputation as a 'market' for overseas students is as much linked to the neglect of infrastructure spending in our universities by your government as it might to some of the rorters in private vocational colleges and the appalling violence to Indian student 'visitors'. In the decade you were in power Australian universities progressively abandoned many education programs and diverse activities for domestic students in their headlong flight into a global market to chase the funds your government failed to provide.

    Quality education cannot be done on the cheap. Your article, "wake up call' is indeed apt. Pity you did not heed it when in government. Now you do your best to obstruct others from doing the job you failed to do. Go away.

    Commenter
    des
    Location
    sydney
    Date and time
    June 28, 2010, 8:36AM
  • One of the great untold stories of the Rudd government's incompetence is that of the international education industry. Australia's 3rd largest export last year, the entire industry is now in complete dissarray following the ham-fisted attempts by Labor to fix what was a relatively minor issue with a few dodgy 'visa schools'. Now, an industry employing 125,000 Australians is in free-fall, with schools closing every week and no sign of light on the horizon. Working in the industry, the most surprising aspect of Labor's changes to me was that they clearly had no understanding on how the system they were attempting to amend actually worked, and a relatively minor tweak that was required (delinking aspects of immigration to study) became a complete upheavel that achieved nothing and undid the good work of 10 years on investment. It has been a real wake up to me personally - do not expect that the government we rely on to legislate actually understands what it is they are setting out to do. It is a shame that no one took the time to learn more about the damage that could be done.

    Commenter
    Ian
    Location
    Noosa
    Date and time
    June 28, 2010, 8:54AM
  • I fail to see why you are so concerned.

    Many international students enter Australia on a Student Visa, pay $30-50,000 to do a hairdressing or an IT course and if they can afford $20-30,000 more, they get a residency visa after doing a 3 month "work experience" - where they don't get paid for the work they do.

    The company where I work had a number of "work experience" students who made no qualms about the amount of money they were paying to get their residency - and it's believed the company they did their training through gave our employer money to give them the work. It was suprising how even though they were generally considered incompetent, we couldn't get rid of them, as do so, put their residency visa at risk.

    The sad fact is, this was happening under the Howard government and continues under the ALP.

    Commenter
    RobbyM
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    June 28, 2010, 8:59AM
  • Is this a case of the budgie trying to give Julia a wedgie?
    If so, then it's another example of Ms Bishop's ineffectiveness. She is proud to have presided over the latter stages of Howard's attack on the Australian education system and was chief salesperson for the false marketing of Australia as an educational destination when the system she helped design only encouraged many undeserving foreign students to apply, thus supplying underpaid workers to shonky businessmen and then allowing these 'students' to jump the immigration queue.
    The 'International Schools' her government allowed to flourish, most run overseas by non-Australians, taught cooking, hairdressing and other useless courses to milk this market.
    Of course such schools folded as profits dwindled and their questionable practices and false promises to vulnerable clients were questioned. A phalanx of visiting 'scholars' lost their money and their chance of citizenship when these shonks shut down their flimsy premises - kitchens et al.
    And now Ms Bishop has the gall to criticise the government for closing the loopholes that allowed her immigration rort via the skilled migration system.
    This, more than any other cause, is the reason for the dearth of overseas 'student' numbers.
    The Colombo plan was quite effective as real educational diplomacy, and, despite its rather patronising approach, has meant a great deal since for the acceptance of Australia and the Australian way of operaating in our region. The Howard government, with Ms Bishop so ineffectively involved, changed and demeaned the nature of Australia's international education system so much that it has become a laughing-stock.

    Commenter
    Jethro
    Location
    Woy Woy
    Date and time
    June 28, 2010, 9:15AM
  • So you were the person responsible during the Howard years for overseeing the greatest rip off in education in Australia.

    Get in the overseas students, dont worry about standards for educating them, allowing the growth of private institutions to make money off the overseas students without providing quality of education and then allowing those students resident status.

    Gee, you think the BER was a problem. Nothing rates with overseas student rip off.

    And, how many of us in Australia really wanted the overseas students? Nothing more than a back door to immigration

    Commenter
    cb
    Date and time
    June 28, 2010, 9:22AM
  • Des, I wold have said on key changes in domestic education (standardized national curriculum, published comparative results, funding mix between public and private institutions) both parties were pretty much in lock step.

    The increase in spending on state schools is an emotive issue. There are many in the community who are ideologically opposed to private education (or at least any government support of it) and from your comments I assume you are one of these.

    Stripped of rhetoric, the education revolution was mostly an attempt to spend money quickly and support the economy, not primarily an education initiative. They certainly managed the quick spend, and the current debate is whether they got appropriate value for money under the circumstances.

    If it is determined that private schools got better value for money due to better management, does that not suggest that governments can achieve more with our taxes by supporting private schools than by pumping money into inefficient public schools?

    I actually believe in public schools, but I think having to compete with private schools encourages them to do a better job. And I do think these sorts of decisions are too politicised in the public sector. For example notice how many signs outside schools are telling us what a great job the government is doing, coincidentally as we approach an election.

    Commenter
    Wazza
    Date and time
    June 28, 2010, 9:31AM

More comments

Make a comment

You are logged in as [Logout]

All information entered below may be published.

Error: Please enter your screen name.

Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

Error: Please enter your comment.

Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

Post to

You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

Thank you

Your comment has been submitted for approval.

Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.