JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

China fears overlook the drive for harmony

Hu Shan
July 2, 2010

Opinion

Almost half of Australians think China will be a military threat within 20 years, according to this year's Lowy Institute foreign policy poll. Such concern is caused by inadequate understanding of the Chinese culture and China's foreign policy.

Nicholas Berry of the Centre for Defence Information in the United States argues that five factors are crucial before a country uses military force to try to establish control over foreigners: a large, unified state; a rising economy; an ideology of dominance; a superior military capability; and popular support for an aggressive foreign policy. Berry believes China does not have the intention or capability to seek hegemony on those five factors, and he is right to say so.

Zheng He, a great navigator of the Ming dynasty, made seven voyages to 30 countries in the Pacific and Indian oceans 600 years ago using a fleet of 240 ships and 28,000 crew. Some researchers believe his fleet visited Australia and America. He brought Chinese tea, silk, porcelain, medicines and artifacts. According to the British historian Joseph Needham, it was the strongest navy fleet of the world and yet it did not occupy an inch of the countries it visited.

Zheng He is not an isolated case; rather, his voyages illustrate the Chinese philosophy of harmony. Confucius stressed the importance of harmony in the practice of rites. Ancient Chinese dynasties saw harmony as a political principle. And modern China sets "seeking common ground while shelving differences and developing peaceful co-existence" as its cornerstone of foreign policy. China does not have the ideology and public opinion base for hegemony.

China has been a victim of imperialist aggressions and peace did not come easily. The Chinese treasure peace as much as their own eyes, if not more.

Deng Xiaoping, regarded as the chief architect of China's opening up, said China will never seek hegemony. President Hu Jintao has said many times that peaceful development is a strategic choice of the Chinese government. And in 2005, the government issued a white paper committing it to the road of peaceful development.

The Chinese people have earnt real benefits from this road. Three decades after the reform and opening-up, China's gross domestic product grows at an average 9.8 per cent a year and 200 million people have been lifted out of absolute poverty.

China may be a big economy, but it is not yet a strong economy. The primary task for the government will, for a long period, be developing the economy and improving living standards. To that end, China urgently needs a long-term peaceful international environment.

I understand there are some worries about the military's growing strength, but its development is appropriate and reasonable.

China has a long border and coast and a complicated surrounding security environment. It has not yet accomplished its national reunification. The primary task of the military is defending the sovereignty, territorial integrity and security of the country. But China's military capability still falls short of what is required. Therefore, it needs to modernise its military.

China is often subjected to natural disasters. One of the military's most important responsibilities is disaster relief. In 2008, only three days after the earthquake in Sichuan, 146,000 soldiers were dispatched for rescue.

China has also positively responded to United Nations calls for peacekeeping missions, navy convoys and international disaster relief missions. Since 1990, it has sent 14,680 people to 18 peacekeeping operations. To fulfil its international obligations, China's military forces have to upgrade their multi-task capability.

Since China began its reform in 1978 it has focused on economic development. For a long period the defence budget was not increased and equipment upgrades were disproportionately slow. The gap with other powers widened. China began to increase defence spending in the late 1990s, yet its current military technological capacity is still far behind some powers.

Some people question China's military transparency, yet true transparency is transparency of strategy. China's strategic intention has been clear: peaceful development and a defensive defence policy. China will not seek hegemony, will not pursue an arms race, and will not be a military threat to any country, now or in the future, no matter how prosperous it becomes.

Hu Shan is the Chinese consul general in Sydney.

 

96 comments

  • If the way China treats it's own people is any indication, God help the rest of us! (unless you've got money, that is). China has killed more Chinese than any imperialist aggressor ever could hope to.

    Commenter
    skeptic
    Location
    Canberra
    Date and time
    July 02, 2010, 7:23AM
  • An interesting and well articulated defence of Chinese foreign policy by a professional diplomat. However as events in Copenhagen illustrated we would be unwise to accept every assurance on face value alone. Events hundreds of years ago cannot be regarded as a definitive statement of intent. Even in this example of the Great Fleet it should be remembered that such fleet operations were only curtailed due to the whim of the emperor.

    Commenter
    SteveH.
    Date and time
    July 02, 2010, 7:48AM
  • China clearly mapped out their borders and territories shortly after their civil war ended 70 years ago. These territories included Taiwan and Tibet. 60 years ago they were instrumental in stopping the defeat of North Korea.

    You may not like the map they drew back then but can anyone name a country or territory that they have since invaded or been involved in destabilizing? The only threat China poses to world peace would be a return to civil war.

    Commenter
    Jezz
    Date and time
    July 02, 2010, 8:34AM
  • I happen to believe China seriously has no intention to conquer the world and colonize every piece of land they can "discover". Honestly, it was the European countries that sought to invade every single port their ships could berth, exploited any local resource they could sight and enslaved all those whom they could chain. This is history.

    Now the fact is China has some serious human rights concerns. But the call for Tibetan independence is as sounds as Indigenous Australian independence. Both were invaded. One did so earlier. I suppose old crimes attract immunity.

    Commenter
    Goodwill
    Date and time
    July 02, 2010, 8:12AM
  • Judging the rest of the world by the actions of the overweening bully who has been terrorising the neighbourhood in recent years, and by the aggressive, rapacious actions of European countries in the past few hundred years suggests that slaughter and steal before others slaughter and steal is all humans are capable of.

    Looking more broadly and further back, this does not seem to be the case. 'Discovering' a new country endowed with wealth and invading it to appropriate that wealth, then leaving it gutted appears to be limited to the Europeans. Others appear to have been content to collect taxes, but otherwise leave things pretty much alone.

    A world with several major powers would seem to offer a much safer, more balanced environment than does the present/immediate past period of one (delusional) 'superpower!

    Commenter
    phindrup
    Location
    bondi junction
    Date and time
    July 02, 2010, 8:10AM
  • I don't believe China have aggressive intentions. I agree it's not in their best interests.

    To say that they are not a military threat if they put their mind to it is laughable however. They have the largest military air force in the world (not as advanced as the US for sure). They have a large number of mobile nuclear installations. If the US build a missile shield they will just work out how many more mobile nuclear installations they need to build to neutralize it. They have 20 million soldiers which is about 30x what the US had at the peak of the cold war.

    They are aiming to put a man on the moon and they may race the US to Mars.

    They don't have the ability to project their power like the US. If they didn't directly confront the major players (including strong alliances) then no-one would be able to stop them. Even then I doubt the US could stop them if they invaded a neighbour (without resorting to nuclear warfare).

    Anyway, it's all good now and I see no reason why that would ever change. But to suggest they don't have the ability is ridiculous. Are you an agent for the Chinese government?

    Commenter
    jacorb effect
    Date and time
    July 02, 2010, 8:00AM
  • Whilst needing to discount some of what is said in this article as the words of a professional diplomat reflecting his governments views, much of it pretty accurately reflects reality. China has never been a hegemonic culture throughout it's history. There have been to-ings and fro-ings around its borders but never a culture that was looking for world domination, such as the major western cultures have been since Rome.

    Commenter
    Lesm
    Location
    Balmain
    Date and time
    July 02, 2010, 8:51AM
  • It's true China is no monolith, with lots of diffrent cultures and peoples and an occupied Tibet if thing were to go horribly wrong it could fracture rather badly. We all appreciate loyalty to friends but who needs friends like North Korea and Burma? And why is that influence not used to modify the totally mad behavior of the regimes in those countries. After all China is the only friend they have.

    Commenter
    Greven
    Date and time
    July 02, 2010, 8:50AM
  • Really! So, that's why since WW2, China attacked India, Vietnam, Russia, South Korea. Let us not forget the constant problems with Japan and Taiwan.

    Ancient China has always been a peaceful one to its neighbours but the moderns has always been a threat.

    Commenter
    sfx
    Date and time
    July 02, 2010, 8:47AM
  • I suspect Consul Hu is right in his analysis of China -- at least I hope he is. But the fact remains that China is an almightly economic power now, and even if it does not intend harm, some of its economic and commercial decisions can be experienced as aggressive and threatening.

    If more of the ruling class in China has Consul Hu's sophistication and intellect, then such unintended aggression can be avoided, but if some of the old sabre-rattlers have too much influence, then some fear or suspicion of China may be justified.

    Commenter
    M T Pockets
    Date and time
    July 02, 2010, 8:41AM

More comments

Comments are now closed