JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

Destroying the Kimberley to mine gas benefits no one

John Butler
August 16, 2011

Opinion

James Price Point in the Kimberley of Western Australia is the site of a battle over a bid to develop a gas hub.

James Price Point in the Kimberley of Western Australia is the site of a battle over a bid to develop a gas hub. Photo: Angela Wylie

I write as someone who is not a fundamentalist, environmental, economic, political or otherwise. I'm not anti-development. If anything, I am a common "sense-ist".

If a government or corporation can develop a given region or resource in an appropriate way, by all means go for it. If not? Sorry but no can do.

The Browse Basin gas fields off the coast of Broome can be exploited to the economic benefit of the country and its citizens without destroying one of the most pristine places on this planet, by piping down to existing facilities in the Pilbara or processing it off shore.

Police watch as during a protest against plans to develop a gas hub at James Price Point near Broome in WA.

Police watch as during a protest against plans to develop a gas hub at James Price Point near Broome in WA.

For a 30-year economic benefit, would we mine Uluru? Would we drill on the Great Barrier Reef? Would we allow any of our iconic locations — say Bondi Beach or Sydney Harbour — to be taken by force by a government intent on mining it? No. None of us would.

Yet this is exactly what could happen in the Kimberley with the proposed gas refinery at James Price Point just north of Broome. We are at risk of losing one of our most unspoiled and iconic places.

Western Australia premier Colin Barnett has gone on record saying "the Pilbara has supported WA for the last 50 years and the Kimberley will support us the next 50 years". It's clear that his plans for James Price Point are just the thin end of the wedge for his vision of an industrialised Kimberley.

Environmentally it's madness to clear up to 25 square kilometres of native vegetation, including tracts of rainforest that are home to already endangered species, on an unspoiled coastline that is refuge for migrating whales and endangered sea turtles.  It's madness to dredge 50 square kilometres of sea bed to build an export port that would create a marine ''dead zone'' when there are viable alternative sites in parts of the WA coast that are already industrialised. Quite apart from air pollution and enormous greenhouse emissions – 20 per cent of WA’s total emissions would come from this project alone, it will also be extremely thirsty with more than 30 billion litres of wastewater pumped each year into the untouched waters north of Broome.

Economically, it's true that the Woodside gas refinery might provide up to 8000 jobs during construction but once finished the plant will need only about 300 full-time employees to operate.  Destroying one of the most beautiful corners of the world to provide 300 jobs, while compromising other local industries, including tourism and pearling, makes no economic sense at all considering there are alternatives. Tourism is a huge part of the Kimberley’s economy, yet to reach its full potential.  As a point of comparison the Great Barrier Reef is worth $2 billion in tourism per year, while the proponents of this plant are boasting the groundbreaking deal with the indigenous people of the area that will pay them $1 billion over 30 years.

On a social impact front, when Premier Barnett threatened ''compulsory acquisition'' of land on which to build the proposed gas refinery, he invalidated the negotiation process and virtually put a ''gun to the head'' of every traditional owner in the region, rekindling an imperialistic attitude harking back more than 200 years. 

This proposal has been sugar-coated as being the saviour to the indigenous people of the region: providing them with a ''last chance'' economic opportunity to secure better housing, health and schooling.  These are rights that every Australian is entitled to and they should never be held to ransom in return for a citizen’s land and culture.

This proposal has divided the indigenous and wider Broome community, turning families against each other in the name of so-called "opportunity". Some traditional owners have had their applications for native title claims cancelled as a result of their opposition to the proposal. My good friend, Senior Law Boss and custodian for James Price Point, Joseph Roe, who is responsible for a heritage cultural trail that runs through the proposed refinery site, is one of them.

But out of this division, a growing sense of unity and resolution is developing as the Broome community stand together and fight to preserve their unique land and culture.  Local campaigners are determined to ensure that Broome does not become another fly-in, fly-out mining town with the raft of social problems that would inevitably bring.  They're determined to protect what is special and unique about Broome and the Kimberley.

This is not a done deal: Woodside's joint venture partners Shell, BP and Chevron are crucial to this deal going through and are still unsure about their preferred site for the project. They haven't given this project final investment approval, nor have the state or federal governments given final environmental approvals.

Make no mistake: this is a national issue. This is yours, mine and our business. Don't let this be another case of us not knowing what we've got 'til it's gone. It's time to stand up and be counted.

John Butler is an award-winning independent musician who was raised in Western Australia. johnbutlertrio.com

twitter Follow the National Times on Twitter: @NationalTimesAU

76 comments

  • This insane urge to mine every part of Australia as quickly as possible is so irresponsible and short sighted.

    Commenter
    SteveH.
    Date and time
    August 19, 2011, 6:54AM
  • Great article. But when you get a few thousand old fogie morons getting more publicity for an anti carbon tax rally, it's going to be an uphill battle.

    Commenter
    ozelite
    Location
    goulburn
    Date and time
    August 19, 2011, 7:16AM
  • Well written John. Digging it up for the sake of short term profits and long term environmental degredation, let alone displacement of common land rights is against all reasonable thinking.
    @ "Old Codger", perhaps we should redirect the digging to start under your "Sacred Site" and hear you bleat about being an "Endangered Species" and that your particular patch is or should be listed as "World Heritage". Maybe you just need to get out of victoria and go and see some of this country and take in the beauty of its state without the destructive influence of 'MANKIND' to truly get a grasp of it rather than being an armchair traveller.

    Commenter
    Cme
    Location
    Sitting beside logical thought
    Date and time
    August 19, 2011, 8:40AM
  • Great article indeed and broadly, yes, we need a broader analysis of the benefits.

    One of those probably needs to be added value. Digging stuff out of the ground and putting it on a ship isn't exactly a sign of a first world economy. If we were exporting finished steel or steel products, for example, rather than just ore, the wider benefit to the Australian economy mght make the sacrifice worthwhile. But this? Pfft.

    As long as this banana republic ecomomic model persists, it's right to question every new ho,e in the ground.

    Commenter
    Mark
    Location
    Dendenong Ranges
    Date and time
    August 19, 2011, 9:00AM
  • @ Old Codger | Tarneit, Vic. - August 19, 2011, 7:12A

    I believe the the coal seam gas companies are interested in your little corner of the world - no objection to extraction plants using fracking setting up on the Old Geelong Road or on the remaining bits of farmland around Werribee?

    Commenter
    BillR
    Date and time
    August 19, 2011, 9:05AM
  • ... The Kimberly is huge - I have been there - and the facility proposed is tiny relative to the greater area. The article is nonesense as you would expect from someone who clearly beleives that appearing on stage as a "musician" qualifies him to comment on things of which he has no comprehension. He clearly has no concept of emissions - the plant emissions will be negligible and the substitution of gas for other energy sources such as coal will have a net reduction in emissions.

    Commenter
    MFL
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    August 19, 2011, 9:12AM
  • @ MFL

    Really? John Butler's article seems far better researched than your comment.

    Did you actually read anything about this project or have you just decided that because John Butler is a musician, he couldn't possibly know anything about anything other than music?

    By the same token, are you a mining or environmental engineer? It certainly doesn't sound like it.

    For the record, I can't stand John Butler's music, but I think he has put together a good article here.

    Commenter
    Will
    Location
    Centennial Park
    Date and time
    August 19, 2011, 9:54AM
  • Tessa's description of the Pilbara warrants a little thought before the Kimberley is opened up to the tender mercies of these land-rapers.

    It's also worth reading Jared Diamond's account of standard operating procedure for US mining companies. Before they started mining in Montana, for example, they happily signed every environmental covenant that was put in front of them. They happily pledged, at the end the mine's life, that they'd rehabilitate the country after they were finished mining, restore it to a "near-pristine" state before handing it back.

    So how did that work? After they dug all the ore out that they could, they did transferred all the money out of the company that operated the mine into a new shelf company. Then they told the government that the operating company was broke, and abandoned the project.

    MArk | Dandenong Ranges has got the right idea. Digging stuff up, and shipping it out for someone else to profitably use is not evidence of a first-world economy, let alone a first-class mentality.

    Commenter
    David_FTA
    Location
    Queensland
    Date and time
    August 19, 2011, 9:59AM
  • It beats me how "economic" decisions are made without understanding the wider context of a proposition and without much care for future developments and wider impacts. Thanks for this fine article.

    Commenter
    sangela
    Date and time
    August 19, 2011, 11:00AM
  • @ Devil's Advocate | Earth - August 19, 2011, 9:57AM

    Who runs this country?

    My guess is a mix between the mining companies and Murdoch.

    The voting public get a choice of puppets at election time

    Commenter
    cb
    Date and time
    August 19, 2011, 11:49AM

More comments

Comments are now closed