JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

From Canberra outsider to centre stage

Katharine Murphy
September 3, 2010

Opinion

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Video will begin in 5 seconds.

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Abbott troubled as Wilkie sides

Tony Abbott offered Independent MP Andrew Wilkie more money, but Julia Gillard won him over with her responsible health spending and gambling reforms.

Andrew Wilkie surprised his friend John Valder when he signed up yesterday with Julia Gillard. Valder, the former Liberal Party president who bonded with Wilkie over their mutual discomfort with John Howard, thought he would remain more rigorously independent, like the South Australian Nick Xenophon.

Valder predicts Wilkie will be, in practice, a ''prickly'' supporter of Gillard and the ALP. This is, of course, a compliment from a Liberal-turned-rebel. ''Andrew is genuine, he stands up for what he believes in. I would regard him as a fine character,'' he told The Age last night. ''I can see stoushes over all sorts of things.''

Wilkie yesterday ended a long and tortuous journey, from Canberra outsider to would-be king maker.

The mercurial Wilkie was first soldier, then analyst, then whistleblower. In 2003 he publicly stood up to Howard over claims that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. For his pains he faced considerable retribution, shunned by the dominant political class, subjected to a whispering campaign in the capital. His marriage was ending; he was unstable, went the ''background'' to political reporters after he quit his post at the Office of National Assessments - one Liberal senator even made the claim publicly. Wilkie was ''at the very best, unreliable; at worst he is flaky and irrational''.

The long path to yesterday's decision began in the seat of Bennelong in 2004, where he stood as a Green candidate against Howard, pushing him to preferences. Valder thinks the hook-up with the Greens was situational rather than ideological.

Wilkie's roots are conservative. Born in Tamworth, he was once a member of the Liberal Party. He should have taken on Howard as an independent, possibly the disillusioned voters in Bennelong could have been lured by an independent - but not, Valder argues, by a Green.

''[Wilkie] was a lost soul and a bit friendless. The Greens extended the hand of friendship and he grasped it.'' The relationship between Wilkie and the Greens extended to a Senate tilt in 2007, but didn't last.

Wilkie was looking like the serial candidate when he had another go as an independent in the recent Tasmanian state election. But then success - federally, this time; Wilkie prevailed in the Tasmanian seat of Denison despite securing only 21 per cent of the vote. Preferences from the Greens and the Liberals tipped him over the line.

Wilkie's campaign was run as ''a pox on both your houses''. In the days following the poll, he said both Labor and Liberal had failed his test.

''It was a vacuous campaign, both have disgraced themselves in some ways. People want solutions, they are sick to death of the theatre.''

Wilkie clearly overcame his aversion to Julia Gillard and her party. Tony Abbott was a good person, but essentially the argument Wilkie made yesterday was the Prime Minister had impressed him as being more competent.

Well, that seemed to be the argument in any case; given the nature of the candidate there was an element of mystery.

Gillard had ''made the best offer''. He had the ''higher level of confidence'' that Gillard ''will do the right thing by Australia over the next three years''.

Katharine Murphy is Age national affairs correspondent.

Poll: Was Andrew Wilkie right to reject Abbott's offer of $1 billion for Hobart hospital?

Poll form
  1. Please select an answer.
  2. View results
Yes, it was way too much and would have made Wilkie look greedy

70%

No, Wilkie asked for it and now it looks like he's just paying back the Coalition over Iraq

30%

Total votes: 14259.

Would you like to vote?

You will need Cookies enabled to use our Voting Feature.

Poll closed 6 Sep, 2010

Disclaimer:

These polls are not scientific and reflect the opinion only of visitors who have chosen to participate.

36 comments

  • At the very least Andrew Wilkie's election to Parliament is a warning to all ploiticians who denigrate those seeking to reveal the unwelcome truth.
    It isn't so many years that Wilkie revealed the very unpalatable fact JH and the Willing Followers went to war basically because George said it was a 'ruuly good ideah', not because it WAS a really good idea. And wasn't the reaction...um willing?

    It's the one upside of the two-ring circus that is Australian government today. For either of those rings to survive, they need the support of people normally considered at the extremes or who's point of view is unwelcome.
    And the likes of Andrew Wilkie who reject the big cake smothered in icing for the smaller one without icing because it's the better option... well, what can you say? He'll never last in politics but while he's there, the circus is going to be bloody interesting

    Commenter
    David
    Location
    Leongatha
    Date and time
    September 03, 2010, 7:14AM
  • We all need to stop and think a little. The Gillard/Rudd Government was a disaster and the spending was out of control.
    They could not do anything successfully.

    Now we have the price on carbon - do we are really know how this will affect the cost of power - the pensioners will not be able to cope - electricity will go up by 30% and this will affect business as well - Australia is on the verge of going down the drain! You may as well just turn the lights off .... the Unions have won if Gillard gets back in.

    I cant believe Gillard might get back in - it will be a disaster for Australia.

    Commenter
    Caroline of Melbourne
    Date and time
    September 03, 2010, 9:02AM
  • Revenge is a dish best served cool

    Commenter
    Nick
    Date and time
    September 03, 2010, 9:18AM
  • Caroline of Melbourne is worried about a price on carbon, and its impact on the price of pensioners' electricity. Caroline's concerns are ill-founded, since pensioners already get discounted electricity. I'm sure that can be extended when (not if) a carbon tax is brought in.

    For the record, I've done some calculations that a carbon tax CAN be revenue-neutral. What's more, what IDIOT would bring in a carbon tax, without cutting other taxes? Certainly, no idiot that warrants a place in Australian politics.

    Here's a set of revenue-neutral tax changes:
    1. Raise income taxfree threshold from $6000 to $9000.
    2. Lower petrol excise from 38.1 c/L to 34.5 c/L.
    3. Abolish payroll tax.
    4. Add a surcharge to the GST on fossil fuels at a rate of $16 per tonne contained carbon.

    The raised taxfree threshold already more than compensates for electricity price increase for average residence.
    The lowered fuel excise will offset carbon tax price increase in petrol. AND less fuel excise rebate is paid to mining companies.
    Tax on employment (patroll tax) is replaced with tax on carbon emissions.

    Matter of fact, there's even enough change left over with this carbon tax for hospital funding, or nursing scholarships, and even whatever compensation pensioners need.

    Everyone else has an incentive to move to low/zero emissions power.

    Commenter
    David_FTA
    Location
    Queensland
    Date and time
    September 03, 2010, 9:45AM
  • Oh, how petty, mentioning the fact that the Tories dragged us into the Iraqi fiasco on bogus grounds. Doesn't he know that when conservatives f#$k up, 'serious' people are supposed to just 'look forward' and pretend nothing bad ever happened? Those countless dead, millions of refugees, hideously deformed babies, and of course the multiple billions spent? Those aren't REAL scandals, like cost overruns on school buildings?

    No need for thought or principles. There are ads on TV for shiny things.

    Commenter
    Redsaunas
    Date and time
    September 03, 2010, 10:13AM
  • @ Honestly ! David_FTA | Queensland. You are as bad as "Enough". Give it a break will ya? Try write a 3 sentence post once and a while instead of your boring intellectual tripe. I agree with Caroline of Melbourne.

    Commenter
    Lesm Schmesm
    Date and time
    September 03, 2010, 10:14AM
  • You're a weak man Andrew Wilkie....But, you've been told that before!

    Commenter
    zac48
    Location
    Melb.
    Date and time
    September 03, 2010, 11:10AM
  • Rob Oakeshott, disaffected member of the Nationals, who left the Coalition during John Howard's period of leadership.

    Bob Katter, disaffected member of the Nationals, who left the Coalition during John Howard's period of leadership.

    Tony Windsor, disaffected member of the Nationals, who referred alleged political enticements of the Howard government to the Australian Election Commission.

    Andrew Wilkie, disaffected member of the Liberals, who left the party and a position of defence analyst due to John Howard's insistence that Iraq possessed WMDs justifying war; a claim later proven false and politically motivated.

    Tony Abbott, John Howard's annointed successor.
    Is there a pattern here?

    Commenter
    Sean og O'Coinne
    Location
    Dapto
    Date and time
    September 03, 2010, 11:26AM
  • Lesm Schmesm,

    And you should switch on your spelling and grammar checks once in a while so you can actually produce a meaningful sentence!

    Commenter
    Lesm
    Location
    Balmain
    Date and time
    September 03, 2010, 11:32AM
  • zac48,

    You are so thick you simply cannot comprehend the courage it takes to stand up to a lying, devious and vicious Prime Minister like John Howard. He tried to destroy Wilkie. Wilkie deserves a medal!

    Commenter
    Lesm
    Location
    Balmain
    Date and time
    September 03, 2010, 11:34AM

More comments

Comments are now closed

More Related Coverage

Poll

Wilkie's Choice

Was Andrew Wilkie right to reject Abbott's offer of $1 billion for Hobart hospital?

Poll closed 6 Sep, 2010

View results

Total votes: 14259

Thumbnail image for video asset.Click to play video

Video

Abbott troubled as Wilkie sides

Tony Abbott offered Independent MP Andrew Wilkie more money, but Julia Gillard won him over with her responsible health spending and gambling reforms.