JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

Rudd's hospital reform more radical than 1984 Medicare revamp

Mark Metherell
March 3, 2010

Opinion

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Video will begin in 5 seconds.

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Rudd delivers big hospital fix

Tim Lester analyses Kevin Rudd's announcement about fixing Australia's public hospitals, with a $30.9 billion funding takeover.

The Prime Minister's $30.9 billion overhaul to integrate Australia's health system goes much further than his simple pledge before the last election to "fix" the public hospitals.

Kevin Rudd is proposing steps to integrate the health system in radical changes, of a scale that transcends Australia's last big health revamp, Medicare, in 1984.

Not only is he proposing to radically change Australia's heavy dependency on hospitals, he is also planning to establish a new "independent umpire" at arm's lengths from government, to set "efficient national prices" of health services to be paid for by federal and state governments.

The Rudd government is seeking to reduce not increase use of public hospitals, thus easing the strain, by putting in place a more efficient, integrated arrangement which, it is hoped, will spur people to be treated by less expensive primary health, (ie outside hospital) services.

He is hoping to assuage the hostility of some states, particularly Victoria, to change by promising dollops more money for both hospital and primary care.

Rudd is promising to double the Commonwealth's contribution to efficient hospital services by promising to pay 60 per cent of the efficient running cost - up from the 40 per cent level recommended by his own National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission.

Canberra would also pay 100 per cent of the efficient price of primary health care services as part of a package he says will "permanently reverse" the decline in Commonwealth funding of public hospitals.

The federal government will also directly fund "local hospital networks" (sounding familiar to the current Victorian arrangements) to "break down the barriers" in the system and deliver better integrated care.

These go much further than was expected.

The National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission, which delivered its report to the Government nine months ago, called for a shift towards a "one health system" to end the blame and cost-shifting inherent today.

The commission urged the federal government to take over 100 per cent of the efficient cost of hospital outpatient services and pay 40 per cent of the efficient cost of every public patient admission to a public hospital, with that percentage figure to be increased incrementally to 100 per cent.

78 comments

  • Congratulations to the Government and the National Health and Hospital Reform Commission for setting out a bold vision. As a nation we need to look to the future of a viable health care system or else we will become embroiled in the type of politically skewed debate that prevent millions of American families, children, women and men from accessing healthcare. As a nation we cannot let this happen. As someone who has worked my whole career in healthcare (both public and private) I implore all Australians to engage in the debate around securing a viable healthcare system for the future. Politicians aside we can do it.

    Commenter
    Steven
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    March 03, 2010, 11:50AM
  • It can only be hoped that this time Kev gets to do something, as this scheme seems to reasonable It is very disappointing to see the Liberals in opposition making opposition there main mantra for everything irrespective of merit. They seem to have lost their integrity, but become spoilers, so that they can then claim nothing is being done. Do they think the public doesn't notice???

    Commenter
    rebecca
    Location
    paddington
    Date and time
    March 03, 2010, 11:58AM
  • Awesome - to address the problem of States spending too much on bureaucracy and not enough on clinical matters, Kevin07 adds another level of bureaucracy. Pure genius.

    Commenter
    Scott Hillard
    Location
    Newcastle
    Date and time
    March 03, 2010, 12:02PM
  • Yes ,Yes, I have heard it all before. Politicions have to do, and not to declare a promise.

    Commenter
    rudolph
    Date and time
    March 03, 2010, 12:04PM
  • When will P.M. Rudd actually do something , and not only talk,talk,talk.

    Commenter
    rudolph
    Date and time
    March 03, 2010, 12:06PM
  • I will believe it when I see it, Will this take 4 years, or 5 or 6 years to implement?

    Commenter
    rudolph
    Date and time
    March 03, 2010, 12:08PM
  • well i guess he cant do much worse than qld labor

    Commenter
    blue
    Location
    bris
    Date and time
    March 03, 2010, 12:11PM
  • Pigs will fly. I will believe it, if and when a fraction of what P.M.Rudd does it.

    Commenter
    rudolph
    Date and time
    March 03, 2010, 12:10PM
  • ETS tax $200b
    NBN tax $43b
    Hospital tax $39b

    When will Rudd stop wasting our tax dollars?

    Commenter
    no-higher-taxes
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    March 03, 2010, 12:09PM
  • Sounds like bulk billing for public hospitals, surely better than the double dipping that is happening right now. However, who decides the efficient cost? if it is indexed like the medicare scheduled fees, it's going to be another disaster in a few years time.... when the liberals take over the country. good one kevin.

    Commenter
    Sceptic
    Location
    Heidelberg
    Date and time
    March 03, 2010, 12:11PM

More comments

Comments are now closed

More Related Coverage

Thumbnail image for video asset.Click to play video

Video

Rudd delivers big hospital fix

Tim Lester analyses Kevin Rudd's announcement about fixing Australia's public hospitals, with a $30.9 billion funding takeover.