JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

Shock loss in Massachusetts ends Obama euphoria

Paul Sheehan
January 20, 2010

Opinion

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Video will begin in 5 seconds.

Video settings

Please Log in to update your video settings

Epic election upset in US Senate

Democrat Martha Coakley loses the race to occupy the Senate seat long held by liberal icon Edward Kennedy.

At 9.20pm today, in Massachusetts, or 1.20pm on the Australian east coast, the era of Obamamania abruptly ended. The euphoria surrounding the elevation of Barack Obama to the American presidency was brought to a crashing end.

It didn't even last a year.

Tomorrow is the first anniversary of Obama's inauguration as President of the United States.

U.S. Senate Democratic nominee Martha Coakley gives a concession speech January 19, 2010 at the Sheraton Boston

U.S. Senate Democratic nominee Martha Coakley gives a concession speech January 19, 2010 at the Sheraton Boston

On the eve of that anniversary, the people of Massachusetts, the bluest of blue Democratic states, delivered a thunderous rejection of the Democratic Party and, by implication, the President.

In a special election to fill the seat vacated by the late Senator Ted Kennedy, the people of Massachusetts did something they had not done for more than 40 years: they elected a Republican to represent them in the Senate.

This was unimaginable one year ago, as Washington was gripped by euphoria over the charismatic Obama.

Shockingly, today's election wasn't even close.

With 2 million votes counted, a previously obscure Republican state Senator, Scott Brown, 50, defeated the Massachusetts Attorney-General, Martha Coakley, 56.

The margin was 52 per cent to 47 per cent, a resounding turnaround, given Massachusetts' voting record.

The result is a political earthquake.

Not only does it follow the double-digit swings against the Democrats in governors' races in New Jersey and Virginia two months ago, it confirms and cements the mood of anger in the electorate toward the Obama-led Congress.

On Sunday, the President rushed to campaign in Massachusetts after it emerged that his candidate was in serious trouble. His attempt to mobilise the party base failed.

A sweeping majority of independent voters went for Brown and an estimated 20 per cent of registered Democrats who voted today switched sides.

This was a protest vote heard around the nation, from the state famous for the Boston tea party in December 1773, an act of civil disobedience that foreshadowed the American revolt against British rule.

Now the Democrats must face mid-term elections in November knowing that, unless the economy turns around, they will lose control of Congress.

More immediately, the Massachusetts revolt deprives the Democrats of the super majority they need in the United States Senate to pass the sweeping health-care reform bill the Obama Administration is trying to push through.

The Democrats had 60 votes in the Senate, which, under the constitution, allows the majority party to override any delaying tactics by the opposition, including the filibuster, which enables legislation to be delayed indefinitely.

Brown has pledged to be the 41st senator to vote against the health-care bill.

It was his biggest issue.

The special election served as a virtual referendum on the health-care reform bill, or "Obamacare" as it has been dubbed.

That referendum has just voted "no".

The election was also a de facto referendum on the enormity of federal spending that has marked the Obama Administration, which is in the process of doubling the national debt in just four years, largely in response to the global financial crisis.

"There is an almost primal sense of fear about debt," a former Governor of Massachusetts, William Weld, said on the eve of the election.

In this context, with high unemployment and even higher job insecurity, there has been a reaction around the nation against massive federal spending. Trying to ram through a historic social welfare program in this context has proved to be a political miscalculation.

It is half a century since John F. Kennedy, America's first Catholic President, and his elegant first lady, Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy, created a glamorous era in Washington that came to be known as "Camelot".

Nothing so glittering was seen again in Washington until the mania that accompanied the rise of Obama.

Camelot lasted barely three years. Obamamania lasted less than a year.

Obama inherited a global financial crisis, a recession, high unemployment, two wars, global warming and an impossible burden of expectations created by his charismatic speeches.

Since then, a grassroots protest has burgeoned around the nation, known as the "tea party" movement, protesting against the health-care bill, Government bail-outs of Wall Street and huge Government debt. A second Boston tea party is now resonating around America.

93 comments

  • The saddest part of all this is the main issue, which is health reform, which in the US context, means a watered down Medicare-like safety net to enable health care to reach less opulent people. Is it a coincidence that many potential recipients are like the President, non-caucasian. I don't think so.. Racism is alive and well in "the land of the free"

    Commenter
    Tony Stott
    Location
    Forster
    Date and time
    January 20, 2010, 1:38PM
  • The US American's are surely insane.

    If it is true that the anti-national health lobby has managed to engineer this outcome then those who DO vote in the US appear to be dumber than those who don't.

    I'd be interested to know what the voter turn-out was as it is often quite low in US elections...so much for democracy.

    Commenter
    Patrick
    Date and time
    January 20, 2010, 1:47PM
  • Obama is just plain lazy. He thought he could swan around making nice speeches and not offend people - and he will follow Jimmy Carter as a one term POTUS because of it.
    Kevin Rudd is the same. He talks a helluva lot and wants to be liked, but fails to deliver - Grocery Watch anyone? Fuel Watch? End the blame game? Turn back the refugee boats?
    The list of broken promises just goes on from the man who couldn't go three rounds with Winnie the Pooh..
    The US press has been holding Obama to account since day one of his administration.
    Here in Oz, for the most part the media just want to hug Kevin Rudd and protect him at all costs.
    After all, the opposition is ALWAYS the story, isn't it Annabel Crabb?

    Commenter
    Shiela Macleay
    Location
    Glebe
    Date and time
    January 20, 2010, 1:49PM
  • You seem to like Obama, please take him! Maybe a few thousand miles of distance makes objects and people appear better than they are.

    btw, I have worked with the Kennedys on campaigns, and Obama is no Jack Kennedy and Michelle is certainly no Jackie Bouvier, lol. I hope this administration truly isn't your idea of 'class' returning to the White House.

    Commenter
    Old Bold Pilot
    Location
    Connecticut USA
    Date and time
    January 20, 2010, 1:55PM
  • Far out - already we are calling American's dumb for voting the way they did! Does that mean they were dumb when they voted Obama in or did a whole state (Democrat state to the core) lose intelligence in just one year.

    And calls of racism!!! Ha ha ha ha ha ha

    Commenter
    Act Rationally
    Date and time
    January 20, 2010, 2:01PM
  • It's really too funny for words. The Left idealists again are confronted with brutal facts of reality. Americas place in the world (love it or hate it) is the warrior against tyranny. Who else is going to do it? If left to their own devices, untold more atrocities would unfold globally: Taliban | Saddam | Bosnia | an almost endless list. China is hardly a defender of human rights and democracy. Europe has a really bad history on this as well. So the hype is over and Obama has now seen the world for what it is: Harsh, inhumane and full of willing despots. His America alone cannot bring freedom and prosperity to all people. They are fallable, but they try their best. They make mistakes, but must be forgiven. The alternative Leftist's dream for America to pack up and leave world affairs will trigger the bloodiest and most fierce global catastrophie. Obama (whom I despised for his potential to bend too Left), now has a small amount of credibility. Faced with the issues like Republicans before him, now knows Americas place in the world and is stuggling with the idealist inside him and the reality around him.

    Commenter
    Talisman
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    January 20, 2010, 2:02PM
  • It's sad that the scare campaign run against the US Health Reforms have been so successful because they will only benefit most Americans.
    It's also sad that Obama is being punished for an economic mess that he inherited because, let's face it, the economic woes that the US faces right now started with Bush!

    Commenter
    Tish
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    January 20, 2010, 2:04PM
  • I'm not surprised, after all Obama has been in power a whole year and hasn't ended war or global warming, fixed the US economy or cured cancer. The assertion of a grass-roots movement burgeoning the nation smells strongly of astroturf funded by Republicans. He's endured one of the most vicious hate campaigns in US political history, and why? He is young, fit, intelligent, articulate, thoughtful, deliberate and worst of all black! Any one is enough to get you hated, but for Obama it may well be a fatal combination.

    Commenter
    BJM
    Location
    SomeWhereElse
    Date and time
    January 20, 2010, 2:04PM
  • Health care aside, using foreign debt to maintain asset prices was never sound strategy and from day 1 only created further contempt from the American Public.

    If I was Obama I would pull out of Iraq now. Give Afghanistan a go for two years and then pull out of there. Least when the next election comes around he would have ended the wars and saved alot of money.

    I am sure Obama knows the money tap cannot be left on forever.

    America shold be using this money to lead the world into the next age of sustainable responsible living free of consumption excess.

    Commenter
    Why101
    Date and time
    January 20, 2010, 2:04PM
  • I watched "Sicko" last night - how can americans not want a decent health care system? They are their own worst enemies with their ridiculous fear of policies that will make their lives better.

    Commenter
    Jo
    Location
    echuca
    Date and time
    January 20, 2010, 2:13PM

More comments

Comments are now closed

More Related Coverage

Obama on horns of a dilemma

Confronting al-Qaeda in Somalia and Yemen risks worsening Muslim relations.

America falls out of love

We all know that honeymoons come to an end, and even on that sparkling January day a year ago when Barack Obama made it official with the American people, both sides realised that bliss could not be eternal. But no one foresaw that the honeymoon would end so soon, with the bride of public opinion packing her bags in the holiday hotel, leaving the groom to plead: ''I never said this would be easy . . . come back, I can still bring change.''