JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

The streets of Conroy are paved with gold

February 17, 2010

Opinion

You've got to look at it from Senator Stephen Conroy's perspective. The fact Mike Kaiser had been involved in branch stacking is not a matter of shame. He was working on behalf of the Right faction. He was an ally. He was successful. He should not have attracted embarrassing publicity. And for that he has to accept a penalty.

The penalty is he cannot run the Queensland ALP machine. This means he can take a $450,000 job in the new NBN company to be established with taxpayers' money. And $450,000 is nothing when you are getting the taxpayers to stump up $43 billion.

Conroy is not what you would call a policy wonk. He has risen in politics by running numbers: in the unions, in the Victorian ALP factions, in the federal caucus. To keep all those people voting the right way you need to be able to deliver returns. Faithful servants need to know they have good employment prospects. This is where Kaiser becomes a role model. Kaiser's doing OK. Conroy recommended Kaiser for a job. And he can recommend others who show loyal service over a long period.

NBN Co will be a fantastic opportunity for job seekers. Most companies start small. This one is going to start with $43 billion. Since it has no pre-existing business it will recruit from the ground up, or as happened in the Kaiser case, from the minister down.

Here's another reason to get Kaiser involved. NBN Co needs a few numbers men. Before the election it was going to cost $4.7 billion to roll out broadband but now it is costed at $43 billion. Labor's pre-election costing was out by a factor of 10 (only a zero on the end). Barnaby Joyce is not the only one mixing up his arithmetic.

As a country accountant, Joyce would know one thing. Before you put $43 billion into a company you normally have a business plan that shows some hope of a return. Yet last week the Treasury admitted it has not done a cost benefit analysis. Nor has anyone. Remember how the government pledged that all its infrastructure spending would be rigorously tested against objective criteria? Apparently that doesn't apply to projects over $40 billion. The ominous lack of a business case demonstrates the utter irrelevance of Treasury to such an important decision.

Here is the senator's genius: the budget is in deep deficit, the government desperately needs money, and this week he announced a tax cut worth at least $250 million. Conroy announced it, not the Prime Minister or Treasurer. This tax cut will be shared between three companies. Never before has a Sunday press release delivered so much to so few.

Normally tax cuts are announced in the budget, the result of the government working out how much revenue it needs and, if it can cut tax, assessing competing claims between, say, retirees or carers or … television stations. The stations won't have to go through the budget process. Nor will Conroy have to argue why media owners are more deserving of tax cuts than the poor or struggling families.

If you want to know how valuable these tax cuts are, Channel Ten's share price jumped 10 per cent on the announcement, delivering $150 million to shareholders. It's harder to assess the gain for Seven and Nine shareholders as they are mostly private equity firms in foreign jurisdictions. But they have reason to be thankful.

Until now the government had said it cannot announce any tax relief because it was waiting for the comprehensive tax review by Ken Henry. The television owners have gazumped all that. It no longer matters what Henry recommends on television taxes. This industry's wish list has been granted.

Every other industry unlikely to get a tax cut out of Henry should get in now. The sooner the better: someone is going to pay more since the television shareholders are going to pay less.

All of this goes to show Conroy has done rather well for the people he represents. I am sure he will regard it as a compliment when I say he is emerging as a real operator - a worthy successor to that other great Labor communications minister, Graham Richardson.

Peter Costello is a former Liberal federal treasurer.

84 comments

  • "Faithful servants need to know they have good employment prospects."

    And that, my friend is where YOU went awry.... or is it just sour grapes?

    "As a country accountant, Joyce would know one thing"

    We'd be happy if he just knew that the only way to prove you're a fool is to open your mouth and remove all doubt..

    Commenter
    David
    Location
    Leongatha
    Date and time
    February 17, 2010, 5:55AM
  • Another example of Mr conroy's bad behavior. No wonder he wants to censor what is allowed to be seen on the net.

    Commenter
    mike
    Location
    fairfield
    Date and time
    February 17, 2010, 6:11AM
  • Let Rudd have men around him who are fat, young Conroy has a lean and hungry look, but Rudd has told us that Conroy is an honourable man. No matter what Conroy does he is an honourable man beyond question delivering the numbers for Rudd while he protects and promotes his friends and supporters as the expense of the wider community. Others will be asking for their cut from Conroy's cake as well for supporting him like Jim Wallace and the Christian Lobby, so many favours owed by Conroy to so few,

    Never a word of criticism from Rudd on Conroy no matter what injustice he perpetrates on the Australian people, for Conroy is an honourable numbers man who delivers for himself and his close supporters.

    Commenter
    Tim
    Location
    Melbourne Brimbank
    Date and time
    February 17, 2010, 6:17AM
  • Come on David | Leongatha - get real - Conroy has handed a huge stack of money to the TV stations in the lead up to an election when all other taxes are on hold.

    Completely inappropriate.

    Seems like the real labour is starting to creep back into Rudd's "new labour" - it's all about your mates.

    Commenter
    Brad
    Location
    UK
    Date and time
    February 17, 2010, 6:21AM
  • Peter Costello, do you really think that readers will suck and swallow 'hook-line-and-sinker' your twisted facts in this article.
    You would be kidding yourself. Why did you not tell the truth about the $250 million to the TV stations? You should know that it was for assisting and covering some of the high expense in changing to digital. Do you want me to name some more of your 'twisters'?? Or do you want to do the right thing and do it yourself?? You are no longer in politics Peter so give us the real facts and we may get some respect for you.

    Commenter
    Fred of Currimundi
    Date and time
    February 17, 2010, 6:39AM
  • The whole NBN thing is incredible. No business plan, no long term modelling.... just a hope, a wish and bags of taxpayer money dropped into Conroy's lap.
    Now he is hiring ALP mates for plum gigs in the whole scheme. What is going on here and when will this crazy Rudd government spending stop?
    Peter Costello is onto it. So are increasing numbers of voters, judging by the polls.
    No doubt this Labor government will run up a massive debt (again) that will have to be cleared up (again) by the next incoming coalition government.

    Commenter
    Bystander
    Location
    Leichhardt
    Date and time
    February 17, 2010, 6:59AM
  • Given the prospect of wireless broadband soon getting to the speed of Conroy's new toy, the prospect of that toy being the most expensive white elephant in history is highly likely (to be Conroy's legacy). Then he will want to spend as much time as possible cooling off in northern skifields.

    Get onto those numbers, Barnaby.

    Commenter
    Craigles
    Date and time
    February 17, 2010, 6:58AM
  • I usually disagree with jsut about everything Peter Costello has to say but on this topic, we see eye to eye Peter. Scandalous !

    Commenter
    Ed
    Location
    Sydney - where were used to scandels like this
    Date and time
    February 17, 2010, 6:57AM
  • @ Brad
    There is no doubt that this deal needs scrutiny
    There is also no doubt that Conroy is becoming more unpopular with sections of the community (and more popular with others) because he's polarising views by his 'decency' filter.
    But this columnist is the last one to comment impartially on any subjects regarding the current government- since, as soon as you see his name on any column, those of us who live here, begin to remember all the underhand deals (such as AWB) that occurred in his tenure as a member of Cabinet. We remember the Treasurer who presided over the largest sell off of productive public assets in the history of Australia and the imposition of a GST that imposed an unfair burden on smaller and cash-starved emerging small industries. No, this is the last person to make an impartial assessment of Conroy's actions.
    It's not 'new labour', 'neoliberal', 'neoconservative', 'neosocialist' or any other label. It's just grubby politics and the sooner we wake up to the fact that this is what it's all about, the sooner we'll cease to delude ourselves that this columnist is doing anything other than pushing his political barrow in the guise of commentary.

    Commenter
    David
    Location
    Leongatha
    Date and time
    February 17, 2010, 6:56AM
  • Costello would prefer we all lived on a steady diet of right-wing propaganda from the likes of Fox News.

    Commenter
    mick
    Location
    brighton
    Date and time
    February 17, 2010, 7:03AM

More comments

Comments are now closed