JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

Church of Scientology: We're being vilified

Cyrus Brooks
November 20, 2009

Opinion

Senator Nick Xenophon is a lawyer. So he understands the difference between allegations and facts.

Yet when he spoke in the Senate on Tuesday night he presented unsubstantiated allegations as if they were factual evidence of what he labelled "criminal" behaviour.

He spoke under Parliamentary privilege, so as to avoid the risk of defamation. But in the sense that he presented spurious allegations as if it were evidence, he abused the privilege that Parliament offered him.

This was not free speech. It was abuse and slander protected by the forms of our Parliament.

The Church of Scientology has been subjected to almost two years of attack – sometimes subtle, sometimes blatant — in various media, in Australia and overseas. There's been a great deal of scuttlebutt and gossip; there has been very little reliance on truth.

There's something of a campaign being pursued against our church.

There is a relatively small group of ex-members of the church who interact online in conjunction with Anonymous, which could be fairly described as a hate group.

These people hacked into and brought down the church's websites for 12 days at the beginning of 2008 and more recently have gained Senator Xenophon's ear. They have calculatedly lobbied him and they hit the jackpot on Tuesday night.

What is occurring here is vilification on a grand scale — falling into a pattern of denigration and dehumanisation of religion, and particularly of religious minorities, which is well known to the world because of its long, tragic history.

Senator Xenophon states as "fact" that Scientologists cannot be believed. Yet he has refused to meet church representatives despite repeated invitations. (Editor's Note: This claim has been strongly refuted by Senator Xenophon.) Such a meeting would have given him the opportunity to raise his concerns and allegations – and for us to respond to them factually, and with proof where this was required.

Yet the Senator consistently denied us this opportunity, stating that a former staffer lost the letter. Well, there were letters. Were Senator Xenophon truly interested in the facts, he would have accepted one of these repeated invitations to meet us and to discuss his concerns.

It's not as well known as perhaps it should be that the Church of Scientology is the only religion in Australia unanimously declared by the High Court of Australia to be a bona fide religious group worthy of tax exemption. That judgment was handed down in 1983, after another period in which the church has experienced great vilification.

Scientology is now recognised in most civilised countries as a religious group and our members are free to practise the religion of their choice, as they should be.

Even the French Government, which is especially prickly about new religions, has not tried to remove Scientology's right to practise as a religious group. And just last month the European Human Rights Court upheld Scientology's case against Russia's refusal to recognise Scientology.

Scientology is a practical religious philosophy that answers questions about life and about living. Its tenets can be used to improve one's own life and to help others.

But ultimately Scientology helps people regain spiritual self-knowledge. These spiritual truths are not unique to our church — all religions have them or seek them.

We believe that Scientology is a workable way to attain spiritual truth. We believe in good works, spiritual fulfillment, and truth telling.

We understand the difference between allegation and fact.

Cyrus Brooks is the vice-president of the Church of Scientology, Australia.

38 comments

  • The basis of Scientology is no more or less fantastic than that of any other religion. Some might portray Xenophon's comments and the current religious debate as one of religious credibility. Credible? Religion? We all must have the right to believe what we will, but believing something does not make it fact. To followers of all religious I say believe what you psychologically need and want to be true, but keep it out of my Government!

    Commenter
    rext
    Date and time
    November 20, 2009, 7:53AM
  • aliens, ancient atomic bombs, science fiction writers, no credibility, aggressive policy on refutation of criticism,
    Paris court convicts a joke organisation of fraud and fined it more than $900,000.

    What do all these things have in common?

    Commenter
    Mickey
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    November 20, 2009, 7:55AM
  • The Church of Scientology is the only one that lures you in with an offer of a personality test, which is then conducted and assessed by people who are not psychologists, who then tell you you need help and - guess what - for a fee we can help you! Cyrus, Scientology is a crock of the highest order, but in tolerant society such as ours we put up with peoples right to be stupid. But when it starts interfering in due process, it must be brought to account. As an aside, if Mr Cruise is an example of a good Scientologist, it says very little for your faith.

    Commenter
    Joel
    Location
    Canberra
    Date and time
    November 20, 2009, 8:49AM
  • How much of Scientology's income is spent on charitable works including on those who are not members of the cult?. What is its total tax free income income, and it is a substantial income given the charges they make for the courses their members undertake? Where does it go and how is it used? Remember that it is on record that the cult was founded by Hubbard in a cynical attempt to tap into the "tax free" funds that are made available by members of other traditional religious groups. But these groups use substantial proportions of their income to spread charitable work among the people at large which in turn saves a lot of government public funds, which is the rationale for tax exemption. Simply put where is the cult's equivalent to the St. Vincent de Paul Society, Anglicare, Centacare, the Various Uniting Church groups, the Salvation Army's social outreach programs and the numerous other religious charitable groups and what proportion of Scientology income is spent on such charitable works .?

    Commenter
    LaVallette
    Location
    Burwood
    Date and time
    November 20, 2009, 9:01AM
  • Cyrus, Australia is a tolerant country. Most Australians would consider Scientology to be based on kooky ideology, but we would respectfully let you quietly go about your business as long as it did not involve abuse. However, when there are allegations of abuse, mind-control and financial deceit, you should expect to find yourself open to scrutiny.

    Scientology is as much a "religion" as any code of conduct to live by that I could make up tomorrow. It deserves no greater consideration or respect than that, regardless of any court ruling (which did not give it divine ruling, but merely defined the tax rules by which it is to be assessed). It deserves no more protection from the law than my religion that I just made up, nor should it be any less accountable to the law.

    Mystical, spiritual, secretive mumbo-jumbo may be effective in controlling the weak-willed and the lost in society, but the rest of us see Scientology for what it is. Cyrus, it is time you stepped down from your soap box, and became accountable for the actions of your manipulative organisation. Why do you need to justify it in a private meeting with Xenophon? The public is more than happy to listen to you directly.

    Commenter
    Karen
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    November 20, 2009, 9:42AM
  • Thanks Cyrus, I haven't had an opportunity to read anything that nonsensical since I started to read Battlefield Earth but gave it up as truly dreadful (and I normally like b-grade science fiction).

    As others here have mentioned - what exactly are the "good works" you do? From what I understand there's nothing at all that comes free from Scientology - everything has a price tag attached.

    Admittedly, the basic Scientology premises of aliens, atom bombs in volcanoes, thetans and other such idiocies are no more ridiculous than than the superstitions of virgin birth, people rising from the dead and walking on water, prophets ascending into heaven, making pilgrimages to walk aound big black blocks, djinn, the book of Moron (sorry, Mormon) or even elephant-headed and multi-armed gods.

    The difference is that the religions based on all of these stupidities genuinely try to do good and carry out charitable works. Often even for non-believers.

    Exactly what good Scientology does is open to serious doubt and I've yet to hear of any Scientological charitable work. After all, it only became a religion to keep functioning when it was banned for its dangerous psychological practices.

    Sorry Cyrus, I normally don't have a lot of time for Nick Xenophon but in this case he's certainly got my support.

    Commenter
    Anthony
    Location
    Victoria
    Date and time
    November 20, 2009, 10:56AM
  • I agree entirely with Senator Nick Xenophon when he said "What you believe does not mean you are not accountable for how you behave." Mr. Xenophon is a public official whose comments are able to be questioned and debated (as Cyrus Brooks and Virginia Stewart are free to do).

    The facts and allegations made by Mr. Xenophon are matters concerning the public record and deserves privilege from a multinational organization whose vexatious litigation is well documented.

    We live in a free democratic society where the separation of Church and state should be respected. For a Senator to comment on Scientology in such a way that openly denounces the organization as a religion but that it is a 'criminal organization' suggests that the initial assessment in the 1965 Anderson Report was in fact accurate.

    The German government firmly advocates that the International Church of Scientology is at best a commercial enterprise, and that it is an organization obsessed with totalitarian control over all free world governments.

    Commenter
    Ryan
    Location
    Shepparton
    Date and time
    November 20, 2009, 11:35AM
  • Lionel Murphy, who made the judgement which gave the 'Church' of Scientology its tax free status in Australia just said that its bizarre science fiction ideology were no more - and no less - crazy than any other religion. They just haven't been around for 2000 years!

    Of course their recent activities - tax avoidance, blackmail and sueing its opponents. He also described Victoria as populated by the "riff-raff of London's slums [...] a very primitive community, somewhat barbaric."

    L Ron Hubbard was ... possibly insane (claimed to the reincarnation of Cecil Rhodes). He was certainly a very poor science fiction writer (who managed, somehow to write many books after he died). He wasn't the Messiah - just a very naughty boy!

    His religion (and Tom Cruise') is based upon upon intergalactic spirits, Xemu and an intergalactic Federation who populated earth 75 million years ago. When Hubbard died, he was said to have "deliberately discarded his body to conduct his research in spirit form, and was now living "on a planet a galaxy away".

    If the scientologists weren't so nasty, they'd be funny.

    Commenter
    Cadwallon
    Location
    Belgrave
    Date and time
    November 20, 2009, 12:19PM
  • See today's excellent letter in the SMH from Allan Lewis Linden. Long live a separated church and state.
    Whatever we may think of Scientology, it is not the role of Government to decide what is a Church and what isn't. Giving any church tax-exempt status undermines this. Charity should be tax-exempt, not religion. Investigating criminal organisations is the role of law enforcement authorities and the judiciary.

    Commenter
    James
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    November 20, 2009, 12:53PM
  • Christian, Jew, Muslim, Scientologist, what's the diff? None can "prove" any of their weird "beliefs". It's all delusion, possibly some sort of mental illness, perhaps even a genetic propensity. As for Scientology itself, I suggest you read the biography of L. Ron Hubbard written by his son L. Ron Hubbard Jr and Bent Corydon, entitled 'Messiah or Madman." Scientology is nothing more than an elaborate scam. A bit like the Catholic Church!

    Commenter
    Misha
    Location
    Selby
    Date and time
    November 20, 2009, 12:58PM

More comments

Comments are now closed