JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

Community broadcasting secures community relevance

Deborah Welch
March 16, 2010

Opinion

As we wrapped up Radio Adelaide’s broadcast and online coverage of Womadelaide last week, I reflected on the festival’s aim to excite, inform and to create awareness of the worth and potential of a multicultural society.

For more than 35 years, Australia’s unique community broadcasting stations have been doing this and much more, fulfilling our remit under the Broadcasting Services Act (1992) to develop and reflect a sense of Australian identity, character and cultural diversity.

Radio Adelaide, where I am Station Manager, was established in 1972 as Australia's first community radio station. But our sector has blossomed in many directions and is as diverse as the Australian communities it reflects. We’re now looking to the future with Vision 2015, our five-year plan for the next era of community media.

When you listen to ethnic and Indigenous broadcasting in over 100 languages, hear Radio for the Print-Handicapped make media accessible, or tune in to youth and seniors stations, you’re listening to community radio.

When you download podcasts with local arts and current affairs programming, stream Indigenous stations online or keep up with the latest local bands via much-loved specialist music stations, you’re listening to community radio.

In response to these community needs and people’s desire to be involved, there are now 526 services around Australia. Notably, 80 per cent of long-term licensed community radio services are now located in regional, rural and remote areas of Australia. We are Australia’s largest media sector and we are not-for-profit.

Every month an audience of 9.5 million Australians - 57 per cent of the population - tunes in to community radio. Between 2004 and 2008 our audience grew by 20 per cent. According to the biennial McNair Community Radio National Listener Survey, Australians value most the local content and diverse music formats that community radio offers.

In fact, our programming is as Australian and as local as content gets. It is created by community members, for their communities and it’s much-needed: 30 per cent of community radio stations report that they are the only source of local programs.

At a time when commercial radio is seeking exemptions from Australian music quotas for digital broadcasts, community radio genuinely supports local talent, exceeding our 25 per cent quota by broadcasting 36 per cent Australian music.

Yet Australia’s community broadcasting sector must renew itself. As we’ve grown to meet demand and stepped up to the challenges of digital media and media convergence, Federal Government support has declined in real terms by 15 per cent since 1996, leaving a cumulative funding gap for both our facilities and operating costs.

Community broadcasters already generate three-quarters of our operating funds, but Government funding is an essential factor in our sustainability and an important recognition of our valuable contribution to media diversity and social inclusion.

Our 2010 Budget submission to Minister Conroy sets out Vision 2015, a five-year plan to deliver significant community outcomes with the aid of increased funding in four areas: content development, co-ordination, training and infrastructure.

In the 2009 Budget, the ABC received more than $165 million in new funds. More recently, the Federal Government recognised broadcasting’s “unique role in preserving our national culture,” granting license fee rebates worth $250 million to commercial television operators. In 2010, community broadcasting is asking Minister Conroy to recognise our unique role through an additional $25 million funding over the next financial year, with stepped funding increases to 2015.

What our keen, lean operations will do with an extra $25 million is an exciting prospect. Beyond radio and TV, all community stations are also working to engage volunteers in multi-platform production and multi-media delivery of local content to audiences. More than 20,000 Australians are involved. Stations in the mainland capitals begin the sector’s move to digital transmission in 2010, with new services to come.

It’s clear that there is strong support for community broadcasting and for the future we outline in Vision 2015. This support recognises that we create something more than media diversity: we provide a dynamic way for people to participate in the life of their communities. And we have an essential role in making sure all communities are able to be part of Australia’s transition to a digital economy.

The Federal Government has undertaken to “embed a commitment to fairness in everything the Government does.” Community broadcasting engages a diverse range of people who may be left behind in the digital economy. To achieve its aims, the Government needs the access, skills and audience of our sector.

Deborah Welch is President of the Community Broadcasting Association of Australia.

11 comments

  • Community broadcasting is not a priority and should not receive funding. The majority of people don't use the service and the money can be much better spent.

    If you want community broadcasting fund it yourself and ask for donations. I'm sure if it is as important as you claim people will be willing to donate.

    Point is stop leeching.

    Commenter
    Sam
    Location
    Parkdale
    Date and time
    March 16, 2010, 11:51AM
  • For the 900,000+ Australians who listen to community broadcasting every month, it is a priority. The same goes for the 20,000+ volunteers across the sector.
    Community broadcasting earns the vast majority (75%+) of its funds from sponsorship, donations and subscriptions. Asking for funding to ensure sustainable ethnic broadcasting and radio for the print handicapped is not leeching: it's supporting a vital part of Australia's media landscape. You can read more at www.cbaa.org.au/cbx

    Commenter
    asr
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    March 16, 2010, 3:38PM
  • Community broadcasting makes Australia a better society. In its many different forms it provides a grassroots perspective that supports local culture and expression. It is the biggest broadcaster sector in the country. If the federal government is interested, genuinely interested in supporting local communities, community broadcasting warrants more meaningful support. Come on.

    Commenter
    expresso
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    March 17, 2010, 8:38AM
  • A couple of corrections and reactions to the comments above:
    Over 9 million Australians listen to community radio - Not 900,000.

    To Sam - To even use the word "leeching" shows a gross misunderstanding of the government's important role in supporting and understanding our country's diverse communities. A diverse media is essential to democracy. Community media enables communities not covered by commercial and public media (and there are a lot of us who feel we aren't) to participate in democratic discussion where otherwise we are not catered for. It's not just democratic discussion either - it's local Australian arts, culture and music that is being supported here.

    To accuse volunteers who provide services to many people who actually REALLY need and appreciate it and who donate thousands of hours every year to provide services to the public of "leeching" is absolutely foul. The community media sector is asking for bare bones basics to ensure that volunteers can work more efficiently and effectively to deliver media services to Australians.

    The government and the public actually receive a number of benefits from the existence of community media, even if you personally don't consume it it's important to understand that giving a voice to the voiceless in an extremely vital part of social cohesion. Community Media people are asking for very little, but asking them to 100% fund from supporters threatens to send them down a commercial path where content is created for populism and not for community value. Asking the free market and consumers to 100% support community media threatens their independence. Consistent base level Government support is important.

    Commenter
    Jay
    Date and time
    March 16, 2010, 8:31PM
  • I think you will find it is leeching why should all tax-payers have to fund a non-essential service that only a minority use. As for your stats, the fact only 900,000 listen to it (many who probably flick to the wrong station) a month demonstrates its low popularity.

    Australia already has a vast medi landscape which is not tax payer funded and which the majority use. We also have something called the internet which anyone can access, just go to the local library. Community radio does not provide a service that is not already provided by the private sector of ABC.

    And the print handicapped can also go to the local library and borrow talking books or listen to commercial radio. As for ethnic minorities they can use the internet, access foreign language sections of their local libraries, get sattelite access to media from overseas etc. I know alot of people from minority backgrounds and they are quite happy with what is offered commercially and on the ABC.

    So no, no more wasted funding for community radio.

    Commenter
    Sam
    Location
    Parkdale
    Date and time
    March 16, 2010, 6:10PM
  • Thanks Jay for correcting the stats....
    More than 9 million Australians (57% of the population in fact) listen to community radio. A major difference between public and community broadcasting is participation. With community media, Australians can play a role in producing media that matters to them and their local communities. This is true local content.
    The fact that the community broadcasting sector has grown by almost 50% since 1996 and that there are a further 95 aspirants for community broadcasting licences suggests that this is a sector that is only growing in relevance.
    It provides what commercial and public media cannot - which is exactly why it continues to flourish.

    Commenter
    asr
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    March 17, 2010, 9:37AM
  • If community radio is flourishing so much then you should not need tax payer funds, find other sources of funding rather then leeching from the government. If it is as popular as you say sell some air time to advertisers. I'm sure small local business would love to advertise ona medium which is listened to by those in their market. That is how the rest of the media gets its funding.

    The majority of the population listen or watch media with advertising, so i'm sure those who listen to community radio can cope with some advetising as well.

    And you know what is really foul? A minority with a sense of self-entitlement demanding funds for a non-essential service when there are essential services such as health and education that require more funding.

    Commenter
    Sam
    Location
    Parkdale
    Date and time
    March 17, 2010, 12:03PM
  • Sam, you must be a Channel Ten shareholder, one of the few who actually benefited from the recent $250 million broadcasting licence fee rebate granted to the commercial TV operators...
    Federal funding for community broadcasting remains both legitimate and valuable to Australian society, whether you agree with it or not.

    Commenter
    asr
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    March 17, 2010, 12:39PM
  • So all the charities and not-for-profits that receive support from local, state and federal governments are leeches too? Some people would say their services are non-essential too!

    The government places restrictions on community radio's ability to advertise so that debunks your argument there. In fact "advertising" is technically banned - the most community radio stations can do is "sponsorship" which is pretty restrictive. Either way advertising strongly threatens independence.

    Sam, over 9 million listeners is hardly a minority and though it may be a non-essential service to YOU doesn't mean it isn't valuable or doesn't contribute to the society you live in. All Australians receive indirect benefits from a strong and diverse media, even if they don't consume the whole range of it themselves. I also find it particularly offensive that you would suggest the print handicapped should just listen to commercial radio or the ABC. It should be their right to have access to the same basic democratic information that other people can read - Commercials and ABC cannot and will not provide this.

    You use the Internet as an example of diverse people being able to contribute, but there a number of faults towards saying "there's the Internet - just use that" - Many people in our society need to be given the skills and resources to be able participate and communicate effectively. Community media offers a structured, non-profit and independent medium with which to participate and helps give people those skills. What individual bloggers and websites often lack is structure, editorial policies, appropriate legal training and opportunity for further learning. Any blog can suddenly go from being independent, to being a commercially influenced form without any scrutiny and that kind of behaviour could be very dangerous.

    Commenter
    Jay
    Date and time
    March 17, 2010, 2:58PM
  • Your arguments for funding are completely baseless. As stated previously the services you claim that community broadcasters provide for the disabeled and ethnic groups are already provided by local libraries, commericial/public radio.

    Jay your claim that the blind need community radio to have access to the same democratic information of those who read is amazing. They get plenty of access to democratic information through commerical/[ublic radio. Radio national broadcasts democratic information, maybe you should listen to it to understand this basic fact.

    I have also gone to the source of your survey. I thought 9.5 million sounded way to high and I see why. The survey questions are naturally bias towards community radio. The first question asks "Are you aware of Community Radio? That is, not commercial, ABC or SBS stations?".

    Most people who are not aware are unlikely to finnish the survey as they will not be interested so naturally those who continue first are aware of community radio and thus listen to it. So you are likely to have a higher yes responce to the second question "2. Have you listened to or heard any of these radio stations at any time in the last month?" as most who don't listen have already dropped out of the survey.

    Next point about the survey the sample is very small only 5,000 people hardly a great sample. And furthermore if you look at the surveys only 7% listen to programs in other languages (debunking you claim it is important for non-english speakers). The majority listen to it for music.

    This is not essential and dosn't need tax payer support. The government also will not give community radio further funding as like me they realise there is better ways to spend taxes.

    Commenter
    Sam
    Location
    Parkdale
    Date and time
    March 17, 2010, 9:30PM

More comments

Comments are now closed