JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

Ifs and butts of al fresco dining on a balmy summer eve

Andrew Stephens
November 14, 2009

Opinion

When a footpath cafe, believed to be Melbourne's first, sparked controversy in 1958 outside The Oriental Hotel in Collins Street, threats to its continuance would not have alarmed smokers. In Australia then, as in the America of Mad Men, smokers could fag on almost anywhere they pleased: in pubs, offices, trains, schools and into the faces of fusspots who had not taken up the habit. Smokers could even light up inside a restaurant, which now seems astonishing.

As tougher laws and social stigma have gradually encircled their nicotine-stained butts, smokers have largely been forced to inhabit the great Aussie outdoors. That's a big place, but outdoors in this city of famously fine dining includes abundant al fresco restaurants and cafes - places now beset by drifts of cigarette smoke. Take a walk along Acland or Swanston streets or past seafront venues and experience the concentrated waft from kerbside tables.

It means, ironically, that smokers now tend to get the best seats in the house during warm weather: ocean views, cooling breezes, summer sights and (if they could smell them) the fragrances of jasmine, honeysuckle or salty sea spray.

The state's Tobacco Act allows smoking in outdoor dining areas unless they are roofed and have walls that cover more than 75 per cent of the ''notional'' wall area. Yet smoke seeps, annoyingly: it can foul your Angus steak, pollute your panna cotta. ''Would you like some carcinogens with that?'' wait staff might as well inquire as you order a caesar salad.

In 2006, the Queensland Government banned smoking in all public places serving food. Fiona Sharkie, executive director of Quit Victoria, says the laws are so tight that pretty much the only unrestricted space is in smokers' homes. In Victoria, diners tempted outdoors by warm weather face a dilemma unwittingly emphasised by anti-tobacco laws: to eat outdoors with irritating cigarette smoke on the breeze, or to retreat indoors and sacrifice one of the delights of summer? As one fellow gourmand told me, food mysteriously tastes better outdoors - so long as smokers are not about.

State legislators are used to juggling the rights of non-smokers (83.5 per cent of us, according to the latest Quit survey) against the right to use this legal, if incredibly harmful and addictive drug. But how far should quarantining smokers go? Should these pariahs be bundled into smoking rooms, as at some international airports? Or should they be subject to so many restrictions that they just stay home?

Victoria has had much success, thanks largely to Quit and to laws that have banned smoking inside restaurants (2001), workplaces (2006), and pubs/clubs (2007) - and Sharkie says the bans are good for business, with sharp increases in patronage since the bans. This year, smoking was banned in schoolyards and, over the next year or so, anyone smoking in a car carrying under-18s will be fined.

A 2008 survey by the Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, for Cancer Council Victoria, found that 67.3 per cent of Victorians agreed smoking should be banned in outdoor restaurants/al fresco dining areas, a move Quit advocates. Smokers themselves, reports Sharkie, generally support restrictions and in that same survey, 42.3 per cent of them agreed there should be bans in outdoor dining areas.

Is that so surprising? It has been 20 years since I had a cigarette, but I can still feel the sly dormancy of addiction, whose chief wile is to make you think you are in control - not only of the physical cravings it exacts, but of the psychological and emotional fish-hooks it sinks in.

Someone once said to me that every puff on a cigarette is an inhalation, unconsciously, of self-loathing. Fortunately, I had support from friends and from Quit, but imposed limitations on where I could smoke would surely have helped, too.

Being in a milieu where smoking is not acceptable, where healthier experiences boost self-esteem (I took up swimming) helps prevent picking up that first cigarette. Compassion from non- and former-smokers helps, too.

I wonder how I, an asthmatic, ever smoked: the joy of being able to smell, taste and savour food has been one of the richest rewards of stopping. Especially when eating outdoors on a balmy summer evening.

Andrew Stephens is an Age senior writer.

46 comments

  • What a timely article having just having to leave my local pub to find a restaurant where I could sit inside and eat to avoid this problem. We found a table outside but 3 or 4 smokers couldn't therefore had stand with the cigarettes pretty much 1 meter from our faces.

    It's not possible to enjoy summer evenings in beer gardens anymore.

    I think I might move to Queensland where I can sit outside and enjoy a meal and a beer or two without being smoked out.

    Commenter
    F71
    Date and time
    November 13, 2009, 8:02AM
  • Give us a break! Not all smokers litter, just as all drinkers can't be blamed for yobbos who leave the weekend streets covered in broken beer bottles and worse.

    For those of us who don't subscribe to the all envolping cult of health and indulge in a legal and enjoyable pasttime, a little bit of outdoor space - which we endure in the winter cold as well the summer sun - shouldn't be too much to expect.

    Commenter
    JMoney
    Date and time
    November 13, 2009, 8:44AM
  • Come back down to the real world CleanAirNow. The two issues - whilst both important - are entirely unrelated.

    Commenter
    Willis
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    November 13, 2009, 8:44AM
  • As a parent of young children, this is a big issue. Often, the best place at a cafe with young kids, especially in prams, is outside. So many times we could not get a pram inside and ended up giving up. Electing to not expose our kids to all the smokers concentrated around the few outside tables.

    Commenter
    AKM
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    November 13, 2009, 8:55AM
  • Oh poor didums, yobbo. We've all got problems. I came from a poor neighbourhood, full of bullies, racists, thugs, druggies and smokers. I've got my bag full of hard luck stories that I could share too. But guess what? I've never smoked, taken drugs and nor do I drink. Stop wallowing in the past and playing the victim. Smokers should be the ones sent to Christmas Island I say.

    Commenter
    BooHoo
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    November 13, 2009, 10:02AM
  • yobbo - by the sounds of it, it's YOUR smoking which was a sign of a bigger problem, you're assuming all smokers are like you.

    Smoking is definately an unhealthy habit, and for the record, I don't smoke, but is it any unhealthier than obesity? which just might be a bigger problem in this society than smoking.....

    Commenter
    Jase
    Location
    Melbourne
    Date and time
    November 13, 2009, 10:09AM
  • While smokers are paying an extra $5 a day in tax they should be able to do what they like, they are keeping our hospitals running.
    When we stop taxing them we can tell them what to do. You can't have it both ways.

    Commenter
    barry
    Date and time
    November 13, 2009, 10:29AM
  • Barry, no, I do not drive; I walk, ride or take public transport. So how's your argument now?

    Commenter
    Brendan
    Date and time
    November 13, 2009, 10:51AM
  • As a former smoker I must admit those self righteous opinionated rude arrogant non smokers really gave me the s-ts.
    As a smoker I was quite happy sit outside on the cold, a bit of rain but I had my spot to myself watching the world go by as the nasty ones sat inside and glared.
    Come summer when they want your favourite seat outside, push in take over forget such simple phrases such as please and thank you, its the cafe owner who if smart looks after his regular patrons be it smoker or non.

    Legislation pushed us outside, we are not black, yellow, blue or of a particular religion but can suffer a similar fate as racial discrimination so if I call you a nigger for being rude to a smoker it's for a reason as you are discriminating just as badly as if it were race.
    How about we replace the yellow star with a long skinny white patch with a brown end?
    Bit close to the bone is it? don't see why it's the same sort of discrimination.
    The hypocritical politicly correct crowd can go take a running jump as they are not smart enough to understand this state imposed segregation is just as bad as what has been inferred to as above.

    Even now that I don't smoke I still sit outside with the smokers as it's better to mix with people who understand suprarational hatred regardless of health implications it's that social stigma almost like being a paedophile which grates me more than anything. If you can't control yourself enough to be polite to a smoker stay at home where you belong.

    Commenter
    Mick
    Location
    Yarraville
    Date and time
    November 13, 2009, 11:40AM
  • Mick, give me a break. A person's skin colour is not a choice; smoking is. You insult anyone who has been attacked because of their race, with your self-important, misguided diatribe. If I discriminate against someone purely because of their skin colour, then obviously I'm an idiot; if I discriminate against someone who blows cigarette smoke in my direction without a worry in the world, my anger is justified.

    If a smoker is mindful of non-smokers and our attitudes, then there is no problem; it's simply a bad habit which many of us have anyway. But when smokers blatantly impact on others, why should they be given any special treatment?

    Smokers have the right to kill themselves, but they don't have the right to take us with them.

    Commenter
    Brendan
    Date and time
    November 13, 2009, 11:54AM

More comments

Comments are now closed

More Related Coverage

How about a thank you to the smokers?

13 Nov Non-smokers have so much to thank smokers for - but they are such ingrates they give nothing but abuse. Probably it's because they can't stand seeing other people have a good time while they are so ...