JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

Lives can be saved when you preach love

Michael Kirby
March 23, 2010

Opinion

In many countries, despite the knowledge science now affords us about human sexuality, irrational hatred of sexual minorities is encouraged - even promoted - by religious leaders, in supposed reliance upon their understandings of religious texts. They rely on their imperfect human understanding of what was written in ancient books long before Alfred Kinsey demonstrated the realities of human sexual experience.

Most religious people are good and kind. I honour those in all religions who are struggling to make a charitable, informed and unbiased contribution to the global struggle against HIV/AIDS. However, officially the Catholic and Greek and Orthodox Christian churches are still in serious denial about the evidence - just as they originally denied the opinions of Galileo and Copernicus that the Earth circled the sun.

Instead of re-examining their holy texts by reference to science (as they have in the past), spiritual leaders have adopted a new, irrational approach. An example may be found in attitudes towards gays.

Last year, the representative of the Holy See told a United Nations meeting that criminal laws against sexual minorities should be abolished. Yet that church teaches that gays must adhere to a celibate life and never engage in their ''unnatural'' sexual conduct. This is a seriously conflicted and unstable instruction.

Given that members of religious faiths should have expertise on the extreme difficulty of enforcing celibacy, it is astonishing such an instruction should be given by presumably rational people, and taught in churches, mosques and temples. Yet so it is.

The stigma over sexual conduct often taught by religious people can no longer be accepted. It is now a major cause of death in the AIDS epidemic. It has to stop. Not only because it is immoral, conflicted, irrational and wrong. Not only because it is a denial of the essential spiritual message of love at the heart of religion. But also because it is seriously impeding the global struggle against HIV and AIDS.

As Bishop Desmond Tutu has said: "Show me where Christ said, 'Love thy fellow man, except for the gay ones'. Gay people too are made in my God's image. I would never worship a homophobic God."

We have a problem which, at its core, arises from the fact that 30 years into this epidemic, we do not have a cure or a vaccine. We have palliative treatment of great utility. But the world cannot afford to provide such treatment to 2.7 million new HIV infections each year.

Prevention cannot work so long as our societies stigmatise and hate many of the people most at risk. Only by getting into their heads and helping them to practise and promote safer sexual and other conduct, can we bring the AIDS epidemic down.

We cannot do this effectively without co-operation and support from religious leaders. Yet too often they are silent or speak against the policies that may help to reduce the stigma; promote the necessary realism; and spread the love of God, not the hate of vulnerable minorities.

Too many preach that condoms must not be distributed, because they promote extramarital sex, and falsely claim condoms are ineffective to prevent the spread of the virus.

Too many oppose early factual education of young people in the safer sex that may help save their lives. Too many condemn syringe exchanges that help reduce the spread of infection by injecting drug users. Too many oppose providing condoms in prisons and other institutions that are potential incubators of the epidemic.

Too many object to the decriminalisation of sex work. Too many fight fiercely against the removal of legal discrimination against gays. Far too many resist removing patriarchal attitudes to women, defending the persistence of their second-class status on unconvincing religious grounds.

Those who criticise these attitudes are often castigated as God's enemy. The religion in which I was raised had, at its core, love for God and for one another. Reconciliation. Universalism. Non-discrimination. This should be the message of religion, especially today. Yet everywhere, the message is different in practice.

Too many old men preaching dangerous messages. Sadly many of them in the past, as we now know, have been hypocrites and false-sayers.

This is an edited extract of the former High Court judge Michael Kirby's speech to a symposium in the Netherlands this week on AIDS and religion.

68 comments

  • It is ashame that an educated and well respected man should have chosen to resort to innacurate stereotypical charicatures of 'religious leaders' in an effort to liberate others from stereotypical charicatures that he deems have adversely influenced their treatment and acceptance. Most of these 'aids victims' to which the judge refers, are not gay, but heterosexual. Most of the aid that they receive comes from the benevolence of the people influenced by the teaching of religious leaders. The implication that a cure would now exist if it had not been for the stonewalling of religious people is nonsense. Perhaps the same thing can be said of cancer! Religion is after all the universal problem.
    Justice Kirby may be interested to know that the Bible does not teach flat earth or hatred of gays. What the Bible does teach is that all humans have fallen sexuality (not just gays) and all are called upon to exercise restraint for the sake of their own mental health and the good of society.
    I do not object to the judge's desire to address some legitimate concern; however, I woud have hoped that a man of his standing may have exercised some of the same grace that he expects from others and to have undertaken a little research before making sweeping statements about what religious leaders teach and what constitutes the central message of religion. Anybody that believes all religion has the same message knows nothing about any of its various expressions.

    Commenter
    Corry
    Date and time
    March 23, 2010, 6:16AM
  • "Too many old men preaching dangerous messages. Sadly many of them in the past, as we now know, have been hypocrites and false-sayers."

    ...so true of the legal profession, although it's not all in the past.

    Commenter
    blinky
    Location
    TAS
    Date and time
    March 23, 2010, 6:24AM
  • Interestingly the people who now run the world, the Technocracy, regard Justice Kirby and his ilk in the same light that he regards the Religious fraternity, purveyors of a frankly absurd series of demonstrably ineffective propositions.

    In other works Justice Kirby is simply a High Priest of the Religion Political Correctness which features as one of its sacred rituals gay sex.

    A likely side effect of this ritual generally when multiplied by promiscuity, is AIDS. It is deeply a deeply regrettable outcome, but AIDS acquired in this manner, like hang glider accidents and health problems arising from obesity, is easily avoidable.

    Its all very well whining about the sacred rite to go hang gliding or to be a glutton or to be a promiscuous gay man, but, the fact is you know the risks in your chosen thrill seeking activity... I will point out to Justice Kirby that after forty years their are no vaccines for hang glider accidents.

    Commenter
    Ray
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    March 23, 2010, 6:44AM
  • Corry; Judge Kirby relatively brief comments about homosexuality are separate to his commentary about sexual conduct and HIV/AIDs. The issue is the Church's obsession with stigmatising sexual conduct, a stigma you perpetuate with silly notion of fallen sexuality and an equally silly attempt to conflate this so-called fallen sexuality with the "sake" of mental health.

    Sure, care in sexual conduct is important for us all, and that may include restraint for ourselves, yet ought not include expecting it for all, and the premise/premiss of fallen sexuality is as erroneous as the premises/premisses of original sin and enforced celibacy, amongst other time-honoured fanciful claims.

    Commenter
    Craigles
    Date and time
    March 23, 2010, 6:46AM
  • I don't see the contradictions that Kirby sees.

    Firstly, Kirby sees a contradiction against abolishing laws against sexual minorities while still arguing that Christian teaching condemns homosexuality. I don't. The Christian teaching on sexuality is what it is, and people should be free to accept or reject it on moral grounds. Except where harm can result (eg rape, pedophilia) the law has no business in the bedroom.

    Secondly, the fact that we have an overpowering sex drive does not mean we should allow it to rule us. Again this is an individual decision where to draw the line. The fact that someone fails to live up to a high moral standard does not make the standard wrong. It just makes it hard to live up to. And this isn't just an issue for gays. Ask the married person with a cheating partner, or the kids torn between warring parents after a messy divorce. This is not to say we should not have divorce, just to acknowledge that whatever decisions we make on sexuality there is potential for people to be hurt. It's hard.

    But I agree with him that it would be harder for gays than straights to live with Christian teaching (though it is hard work for anyone), and I agree 10,000% that people should not be vilified just because they are gay.

    Commenter
    Matt
    Date and time
    March 23, 2010, 7:02AM
  • Corry, I think you need to (1) re-read what Mr Kirby actually said, (2) read it again, and (3) read it one last time. You've missed the point entirely.

    Commenter
    Timaahy
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    March 23, 2010, 7:12AM
  • There are people in society who should be listed to and those who should not. Mr Kirby is one of those who should be listed to.

    Australia needs a government to collect taxes and run services with those taxes as well as securing the future. Decisions on matters of human values though should be left to a council of wise elders consisting of the likes of Mr Kirby. Of course, the likes of John Howard and Alan Jones eta al would not be part of such a counsel.

    Commenter
    AntiConservative
    Location
    St Ives
    Date and time
    March 23, 2010, 7:14AM
  • It is interesting that Judge Kirby does not include the Buddhist religion in his commentary. Perhaps he is unaware that the Dalai Lama is strongly against homosexual acts of physical love.One could well understand the Dalai Lama's concerns for such acts taking place in the monkhouse. Certainly he advocates tolerance to homosexuals and so his views are quite similar to those Christian faiths vilified for their "homophobia". But given the great and growing popularity of Buddhist religion in Australia, perhaps Mr Kirby believes the message will be sullied but including the buddhist hypocrisy!Furthermore Mr Kirby claim that science explains and somehow exonerates behaviour that is harmful to health such as the fact that anal sex leads to rectal prolapse and other illness. And finally whilst the HIV-AIDS situation in developing countries is very serious and requires emergency attention. The same cannot be said in developed countries. There are massively underfunded health issues in Australia like diabetes but much of the funds and efforts are directed to HIV-AIDS. It is unlikely that "fat" lower socio-economic groups are going to win against a well organised and politically savvy group from the professional classes.

    Commenter
    Tony
    Date and time
    March 23, 2010, 7:22AM
  • Of course Michael Kirby should have qualified his talk by saying 'some' religious leaders. However, his message is clear. There are some Christian people who do not practice what the bible teaches and some religious leaders who have a vested interest in making sure that this continues.

    Commenter
    wotnext
    Location
    Leongatha VIC
    Date and time
    March 23, 2010, 7:20AM
  • Michael Kirby's preferred religious text is Alfred Kinsey, whose 1960s claim that homosexuals comprised 10 per cent of the population is part of the gospel of swinging "love" - despite admissions by his collaborators that the figure was invented. (Despite every effort to retrospectively produce studies to justify the number, it always comes up at under 2 per cent - but the True Believers won't change their belief in the face of the facts.)

    Oh, and Catholic and other religious hospitals care for about a third of AIDS victims worldwide, and the only African countries where the infection rate has been reduced are those who teach A-B-C Abstinence, Be faithful, Condoms - in that order.

    Surely, you should first stop the risky behaviour, Justice Kirby?

    It seems disingenuous of a judge to ignore the evidence and stick to discredited ideological beliefs.

    The effect of this ideology was seen last month in Haiti, when some shipments of food to earthquake were delayed because of urgent condom deliveries.

    Commenter
    Choose your texts
    Date and time
    March 23, 2010, 7:25AM

More comments

Comments are now closed