JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

So who's the bunny as granddaddy of porn reweds?

Gail Dines
June 14, 2011

Opinion

Hugh Hefner and his fiance, British-American model and singer Crystal Harris.

Hugh Hefner and his fiance, British-American model and singer Crystal Harris. Photo: Reuters

Many an article in Hugh Hefner's Playboy has painted a misogynous view of marriage.

HUGH Hefner is getting married again on Saturday. Granted, it is to a woman 60 years his junior, but who would have believed that the once marriage-phobic ''Hef'' would take another walk down the aisle?

In his younger days, Hefner was the owner of a magazine that zealously warned men away from marriage, telling them over and over that women were out to ruin them financially. Indeed, while Hefner made millions selling pictures of women's bodies, he also sold the idea that women might threaten his readers' free-spending bachelor lifestyle that lured advertisers and formed the bedrock for Playboy's business model.

The first issue of Playboy ran the feature ''Miss Gold-Digger of 1953''. Bemoaning the good old days when alimony was reserved for ''little floozies'', the Playboy editors wrote: ''When a modern-day marriage ends, it doesn't matter who's to blame - it's always the guy who pays and pays and pays.'' Burt Zollo, writing in the June 1954 issue, warned Playboy readers to be wary of June (did you hear that Hef? June!), the marriage month, since ''women become more heated, more desperate, more dangerous''. Zollo advised readers to take a good look at the ''sorry, regimented husbands trudging down every woman-dominated street in this woman-dominated land''.

Many articles followed, all saying the same thing: women are economic predators, and men need to protect themselves from what Playboy called ''the womanisation of America''. If Hefner still holds this view, I hope the future Mrs Hef has a good prenup.

During his heyday, Hefner was depicted as the quintessential American rags-to-riches success story. Praised by Newsweek in January 1964 as a hardworking businessman who ''works as much as 72 hours a week'' and described as ''modern, trustworthy, clean, respectable'' by Time magazine in March 1963, Hefner has been consistently cleansed by the media of the sleaze factor often associated with pornographers.

In her book Bunny Tales, Izabella St James, an ex-''girlfriend'' of Hefner, writes about what really went on at the mansion; how Hefner would have unprotected sex with a number of women, one after the other, and irrespective of how many women he had penetrated, could only reach orgasm by masturbating to pornography. Needless to say, this is not the image that Playboy likes to project.

Hefner was the man who turned porn into an industry. He took it from the back street to Wall Street and, thanks in large part to him, it is now worth billions of dollars a year. While we have always had pornographic images, it was the launch of Playboy magazine that marked the entry of porn into mainstream US capitalism.

Advertisers, once they realised Playboy was popular with the upwardly mobile, middle-class male, flocked to buy space and - for the first time - porn became integrated with consumer culture. It promised men that if they consumed the right products, the ones being advertised in Playboy, they would get the real prize: the ''girl next door'', who looked just like the centrefold.

Playboy Enterprises has just opened a new club in London in an attempt to stay relevant in a world where mainstream porn has moved from sexist pinups to hardcore misogynist images of women being brutalised. The body-punishing porn that now dominates the internet may look very different from an issue of Playboy, but at its core all porn is a market transaction in which women's bodies and sexuality are offered to male consumers in the interest of maximising profit.

Hefner is the granddaddy of today's porn industry, and how fitting that at the weekend he will marry a woman young enough to be his granddaughter.

GUARDIAN

Gail Dines is a sociology and women's studies professor at Wheelock College, Boston.

twitter Follow the National Times on Twitter: @NationalTimesAU

132 comments

  • Watch the Ricky Gervais Intro to the Golden Globes, where he mentions Hef and his latest. Watch DeNiro's reaction.

    Brilliant!

    Commenter
    Albers
    Location
    Location, Location, Location
    Date and time
    June 14, 2011, 7:35AM
  • Grandpa Hef is as troubling as the feminists of his generation who didn't foresee the dangers of impetuously transforming a society and an economy on the spurious notion that men and women are the same. (How same depends on which of the three million variations of a feminist you happen to be).
    Hef is a symptom rather than a cause. Perhaps he shares more in common with Gail Dines than she realises.

    Commenter
    JD
    Date and time
    June 14, 2011, 7:42AM
  • Someone needs to ask Hefner, "Why aren't you attracted to women your own age?"

    Commenter
    Syd
    Date and time
    June 14, 2011, 7:57AM
  • This guy is my hero!

    Commenter
    tfre
    Location
    sydney
    Date and time
    June 14, 2011, 8:00AM
  • Ok, let me see if I am following this right. Hef is getting married, he is the 'creator' of porn, and bad things happen in porn that he does not have control over... where is her point? Bit non sequitur? What does any of it have to do with 'violent degrading' porn?

    "men need to protect themselves from what Playboy called ''the womanisation of America''"

    Ignorant rhetoric hyperbole no doubt, but all you have done is answer it with... well more hyperbole.

    "what really went on at the mansion"

    This comes as a suprise to anyone? Really? Are there really people out there who beleive that the Playboy mansion is a celibate place?

    "It promised men that if they consumed the right products, the ones being advertised in Playboy, they would get the real prize: the ''girl next door''

    Yes, it is called advertising. It works in the same way that people beleive that gym products promoted by Randy Couture will give them a MMA fighters body, or that a designer dress will make a woman look like a fashionista. If this is news to you, you are very far behind the times.

    Commenter
    Peyton
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    June 14, 2011, 8:17AM
  • Dines articles sums up Hefner very well in that it exposes him for what he is and has always been; a self absorbed existentialist. The 'freedom" he offered the world in terms of making porn legitimate has left us with a generation of young men who respond to women as he does, with callous disregard of them as anything but objects for pleasure. The porn culture he sporned has now make a daily trip to the favourite web page an institutionalised part of many young male's day.It has shaped their view and understanding of sex and women, and will continue to destroy all normal sense of sexual love and relationships just as it did for this ageing dirt bag.

    Commenter
    Mark
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    June 14, 2011, 8:37AM
  • "If Hefner still holds this view, I hope the future Mrs Hef has a good prenup."

    There you go: you've confirmed everything that Hef has been saying IS true.

    Commenter
    Johnson
    Date and time
    June 14, 2011, 8:40AM
  • Yes, he's my hero too, even if he is a slimeball.

    @Syd - June 14, 2011, 7:57AM "Someone needs to ask Hefner, "Why aren't you attracted to women your own age?"

    Hey, Syd. You really don't know the answer? Really? Then you can't be living in the real world. The man is wealthy. That's all you need to know. Nothing to do with being an American or a pornographer or even of being male. Just reality. Dream on, Syd, in whatever fantasy you choose, but if you ever pass Planet Earth, give us a wave.

    Commenter
    Fred Flintstock
    Date and time
    June 14, 2011, 8:43AM
  • "Hefner is the granddaddy of today's porn industry, and how fitting that at the weekend he will marry a woman young enough to be his granddaughter"

    I don't understand this last comment. Is Dines suggesting that people who view or indulge in pornography also condone pedophilia?

    Aside from that curious comment, Playboy cannot really be categorised as pornography. It has pictures of naked women, and articles about sex. Pornography is commonly explicit depictions of sex acts, with electron-microscope close-ups of every mechanical detail.

    Forget about your misguided prejudices, and try to understand your subject before you write about it.

    Commenter
    Muammar
    Location
    Melburbia
    Date and time
    June 14, 2011, 8:50AM
  • A stupid biased article. There is no connection between Hefner and violent porn. Violent porn has always existed and is not connected to Hefner or playboy. Hefner is very likely to hold the same views concerning the womanization of the US because they are accurate. US divorce settlements often destroy men financially but seldom destroy woman regardless of who is at fault.Playboy shows naked woman but few would view it as porn in fact it lacks eroticism because it is so squaky clean. Playboy is struggling because of the access to hard core porn on the internet. Hefner annoys femenists because he refuses to comply with their view of the world. The article shows that. Men like young attractive woman
    all their lives few can fulfil their dreams Hefener may be unusual because he can turn his dream into a reality Hefner is breaking no laws and bitter femenists had better learn to live with it. I am tired of the Germaine Greers of this world they really are porn and cause immense damage to relationships with their bitterness. The above article is utter nonsense. I can only suggest if that is all it takes to be a professor standards have fallen it isn't worthy of a hack writer.It is small on logic and critical analysis and big on bitter feminie prejudice. Given the credentials of the writer and the fact is it sourced from the Guardian it is no surprise.

    Commenter
    Michael
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    June 14, 2011, 9:08AM

More comments

Comments are now closed