JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

New feature Personalise your news, save articles to read later and customise settings View Demo

Hi there! Beta version

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

National Times

Teach kids how to think, not what to believe

Nina Funnell
October 22, 2010

Opinion

Illustration: Frank Maiorana

Illustration: Frank Maiorana

Do you remember how you found out the truth about the jolly fat man in the red suit or the fluffy bunny who delivers chocolate once a year? How did you react at the time? Was it a painful process at all?

For me I was about five or six. I was rolling around on my parents' bedroom floor when I suddenly spied a number of toys under their bed including one fluoro green hula-hoop (note to parents: hiding gifts under the bed is both predictable and silly as vertically challenged individuals can easily access this space.)

Weeks later, an identical fluoro green hoop was bestowed upon me with a greeting card signed by one "Santa". A basic handwriting comparison of the various other cards in my stocking and a quick check under my parents' bed confirmed my suspicions.

This "truth" I had uncovered did not distress me. On the contrary I felt proud of my detective skills and an urgent need to get the message out to all and sundry.

Other children — I was sure — would greet the explosive news with a mix of surprise and inquisitiveness. Naively, I was convinced that I was sitting on a great "scoop".

Not long after this I was being minded by a classmate's mother. As I excitedly told my classmate of my discoveries he burst into tears, calling me a liar before running to his mother. She in turn contradicted me, reassuring her son, that I was just "playing silly tricks" on him.

As she cajoled and comforted her son, his tears dried and were replaced by a look of smug self-righteousness; the adult adjudicator had spoken and he had been declared the victor. Minutes later, he was gloating over me, parading about with an insufferable air of superiority and condescension.

The whole episode baffled and frustrated me. I was too young to understand why the mother did not immediately fess up. Nor could I understand his hysterical and emotional reaction on being presented with a set of rational facts.

Later I reported this experience to my own parents who diligently explained that while my facts may have been correct, it was cruel of me to shatter the "magic" of Christmas for other children by painting the whole thing as a big sham.

And so I learnt to shut my mouth.

But the experience taught me a number of things. Firstly, people's belief systems are changeable but this process is complicated and is usually triggered by introspective interrogation and critical thinking, not by external correction and imposition of views.

Secondly, some people will always place more importance on faith than on facts. And this is their prerogative to do so.

Thirdly, young children may forever be asking questions about the world, but most of them will blindly believe whatever the authority figures in their lives tell them.

And this is precisely why it is unethical to indoctrinate children through religious direction.

That is not to say that children cannot be introduced to the concept of religion (and the fact that there are many many religions in the world — none of which have universal support and all of which have attracted considerable criticism). Nor does it mean that children cannot be introduced to ethical frameworks for decision making.

But surely it is important that we nurture children's critical thinking and reasoning capacities rather than simply telling them to unquestionably accept what they are told?

NSW is currently set to go ahead with secular ethics classes that have been successfully trialled. These classes will provide those students who do not attend religious education classes with the opportunity to engage in ethics-based lessons.

Unlike moralising sermons, which strictly dictate right from wrong, these classes are designed to teach children how to think through the complex process of working out what is ethical or unethical (or somewhere in between) in any given dilemma.

It's a vast deal different to the hard and fast (but ultimately unhelpful) "rules" that my generation was given in religious classes, such as "no sex before marriage" and "gay sex is a sin". Thank goodness times are a-changing.

Nina Funnell is a researcher in the Journalism and Media Research Centre at the University of NSW.

136 comments

  • Nina - all eminently sensible and rational. I can't wait to see the responses that will come in - the religious don't ever seem to be aware that their over-the-top responses are exactly the type of behaviour that proves their irrationality.

    Commenter
    BillR
    Date and time
    October 25, 2010, 5:47AM
  • I enjoyed the article and agree, the section below is quite important.
    "it is important that we nurture children's critical thinking and reasoning capacities rather than simply telling them to unquestionably accept what they are told?"
    As a pupil at a catholic school many, many years ago it was a given that you unquestionably accepted what you were told. As a child who suffered from terminal curiosity I tended to ask the teachers questions when we had religious instruction. Not surprisingly I was sent to the priest a number of times, he advised me that questioning was the path to hell and apparently I was on the slippery slope.
    If people want to raise their children in a particular religion that is their choice, however, where is the harm in nurturning their critical thinking and reasoning capacities.

    Commenter
    comment
    Date and time
    October 25, 2010, 6:10AM
  • Teach kids how to think, not what to believe?

    Amen to that

    Commenter
    SH
    Location
    ....
    Date and time
    October 25, 2010, 6:16AM
  • An excellent and thoughtful article.

    Commenter
    Lesm
    Location
    Balmain
    Date and time
    October 25, 2010, 6:44AM
  • Thank you Nina for injecting some common sense into the debate. I would however like to interject that while the ethics classes appear to solve the problem of allowing non-religious students the chance to "do something meaningful" instead of sitting in the corridor during scripture, the inherent problem here is the fact that we are dividing up the children in what is supposed to be a secular and inclusive public education system - for all children regardless of their parents religion. Does anyone else see the harm in doing this? Critical thinking, as is taught in the ethics classes, should really be apart of the curriculum. Scripture classes, should be moved outside of school hours.

    Commenter
    Jason
    Location
    South Yarra
    Date and time
    October 25, 2010, 7:11AM
  • Excellent article. This is what I have strived for with my 8 year old son. In my household there are divergent views, my wife is a believer, whist I'm an agnostic atheist. We did allow him to attend scripture classes at school moslty because we did not want him to feel different, but both my wife and I have agreed that he would be attending ethics classes as soon as we're offered them. I never brought out the subject of my beliefs with him, I just waited until it came naturally.

    Eventually it did; picking up on subtle clues, one day he came up to asked me: "Dad, do you believe in God?". I went ahead and explained in simple terms what an agnostic is. Then proceeded to clear that, although I could not tell for sure, I believe there is no God.

    A couple of days latter I heard him explaining to his mum that he believed in God, but could not tell for sure. I was so proud, he had found his own position, not coerced by anyone. He's an agnostic theist, a happy middle between his mum and me.

    Commenter
    The Gremlin
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    October 25, 2010, 7:15AM
  • Why is that teaching religion is always 'indoctrination' to the PC Fundamentalists? I notice that Nina wants her brand of 'thought' rammed into the kiddies brains as early as possible. Indoctrination in PC and PC thinking methods as the only possibility - or as the default - is every bit as damaging to children as Sunday School and Scripture class, and just as based in religious faith, only anti-Christian PC Fundamentalism instead of traditional faith.

    Religion and philosophy is the result of logic and critical thinking, as we've known since Plato. That Nina Funnell is too ignorant of religion other than PC Fundamentalism to make unbiased comment should be bleedingly obvious to all.

    Commenter
    Brendan
    Location
    Canberra
    Date and time
    October 25, 2010, 7:20AM
  • A very good article. I'm a Christian,and have been all my life, but I unlike some Christians I've encountered, I adhere to the belief that no one should have another's beliefs forced on them. Talk about your beliefs when the opprtunities arise, but bully-boy evangelism is never acceptable. This is especially important in schools. I think RE should be a part of the school curriculum, but it needs to encompass all religions, and taught with a mind to teaching children about different cultures. There was never a more important time to teach children about true Islam, as opposed to the extremist version that is so often used to scare us into compliance.

    Children must be taught to think rationally and objectively, and if they choose religion for themselves, then so be it. The same goes if they reject religion.

    I think, though, that there is also a danger in that teachers need to avoid the temptation to teach children to think the way that they want them to think. Too often I hear from my nephew that he's written an essay that is meant to be subjective, only to be given bottom marks because he hasn't conformed to the teacher's way of thinking.

    Yes, please, teach children to think objectively about all things. Not just religion.

    Commenter
    blu
    Location
    Geelong
    Date and time
    October 25, 2010, 7:21AM
  • Great article. But keep in mind that rational thought and critical reasoning are not common attributes of society. Most parents don't do it themselves so they can't possibly teach their children to do it. Furthermore, they are suspicious of anyone who tries to teach their children to think differently. This is not just about religion. It's human nature to act irrationally.

    Commenter
    DC
    Location
    Sydney
    Date and time
    October 25, 2010, 7:29AM
  • Great article Nina! Who could disagree that the world would be a better place if we were all practicing more critical and reflective thinking. It's a pity not all children will be participating in ethics classes.

    Commenter
    Jane H
    Date and time
    October 25, 2010, 7:39AM

More comments

Comments are now closed